Report: [FL:RP] Awestruck

[Ali]

User has been warned for this post. Reason: Other 1 Point

We will not make any decisions until we hear from Ghost. So unless you yourself have a video proving that you are innocent and it was merely only crossfire then please do post it and this can all end but as it stands right now there isn't sufficient evidence to deny this ban request.

I only have a few screenshots(posted the ones that were relevant). There is zero point in me publishing the full unedited versions as I only cropped out the full thing so I can show you what we're looking at.

Also, you state this : 'stands right now there isn't sufficient evidence to deny this ban request.'. Explain to me how yourself and Grub have decided that there is ins't evidence to prove his innocence. The facts stand that they were near a gun fight and they got hit 3 times. They have no proof Awestruck aimed at them specifically or it was intentional. 

This is why Ivan closed this case because there was no evidence to prove Awestruck hit him on purpose. This is also why Audacter didn't ban Awestruck in game also.

'3. Evidence is a requirement, do not request log checks, include solid evidence for your report or do not post one. '

This is a rule of the ban request forums. Rims nor Budy have provided any solid evidence that Awestruck intentionally shot Rims.  The only evidence is the logs which show the damage but you cannot prove that it wasn't crossfire. 

I am requesting Tempski and Audacter to comment on why they didn't ban Awestruck because NIghthawk and you Grub are both looking for a reason to ban Awestruck and you have made that perfectly clear.
' right now there isn't sufficient evidence to deny this ban request.'
'Alright. Well Ivan you may not like me here but well I'm here to do things right'

Also, as I said before. The photos of the gas masked person are me and my firing position. Some people were on the flat ground and some people were elevated. It might look like in my screenshots that I had a downward angle does not mean Awestruck did because I told everyone to spread out and Awestruck decided to be on the ground.

Again, I am requesting Tempski and Audacter to re-comment on why they didn't ban Awestruck. 


Also, Grub you state 'hard punishment will be taken' etc...But you allow Budy to present a photo he made which made it look like there was no SRU around him. this directly violates this rule:

'5.  Fabricating or tampering with evidence with intent to mislead, and providing false statements is under zero tolerance - committing such violations will lead to a perm ban.'

I am also requesting that Grub and NightHawk do not decide what happens in this thread. They both have a personal venteta against Awestruck which is quite obvious from these quotes: 

 'right now there isn't sufficient evidence to deny this ban request.'
'Alright. Well Ivan you may not like me here but well I'm here to do things right'

This I only assume has been due to this thread that Awestruck posted on NightHawk(notice who denied the admin abuse):
http://www.fearlessrp.net/showthread.php?tid=64900