Adding fuel to a flamewar.

[JMR]

-snip-

I am failing to see how I was 'Off-Topic' and 'Inciting Flame' when I made my opinions, which (due to the actually quite civil nature of the thread) no-one took the wrong way [I thank member's for that, because usually at Fearless - it does turn quite nasty... but it didn't this time]. I said goodbye. I replied to members.

The thread was closed due to a flamewar occurring. Part of which I believe you and fultz had an influence on.

---

Where was the teamwork? You have to remember, this is an admin case, since the thread was indeed closed.

Please say your goodbyes and leave it at that.

You may post your opinions and state goodbye...

Big difference.

Why was the thread closed? If what you were doing wasn't participating in a flamewar, then, in my opinion the thread should not have been closed in the first place. Other users stated their opinion on what they have observed, related to previous replies from other users. I see no difference between their replies and yours.

EDIT:

...[I thank member's for that, because usually at Fearless - it does turn quite nasty... but it didn't this time]...

Actually, according to Enzyme, the thread had to close because apparently a "flamewar" had occurred and had gotten out of hand.

---

EDIT 2:
Also, as far as "...gossip and lies are spread without any facts to back up anything." Perhaps this may interest some.

"Please provide substantial evidence that there was a demotion. As a matter of fact, Eisenhorn resigned."

[18:47] <+Enzyme> This is obviously for the HR to decide, but should Eisenhorn be demoted for what he has done? Opinions?
[18:47] <+Enzyme> If so; Veteran tag?
[18:47] <Fultz> The last on is Inactivity but that is now voided due to him supplying a reason
[18:47] <Fultz> No Tag
[18:47] <Faustie> Eisenhorn's actions aren't entirely his own I don't think
[18:47] <Fultz> Mods dont get tags
[18:47] <Faustie> From what I remember, KJ/Narc wanted someone to be their attack dog
[18:47] <+Floodify> Veteran Tag, no
[18:47] <Faustie> a la Ruxandra style
[18:47] <+Floodify> Demote , Yes
[18:47] <Fultz> Yes that was his job
[18:47] <+Shadewie> I think that he should be demoted for his actions and no veteran.

[18:54] <Fultz> Alright so who believes Eisenhonr should be demoted? Yes to demotion or no to demotion
[18:54] <+Enzyme> YEs
[18:54] <+Kpred> Yes
[18:54] <+Shadewie> Yes
[18:54] <Fultz> Yes
[18:54] <+Floodify> Yes!
[18:54] <+LukeAviator> Yes.
[18:54] <@Flame223> Yes
01[18:54] <Termin> On the fence

03[19:01] * Faustie changes topic to 'Fearless Administrator Commitee -- CURRENT TOPIC: WHAT TO TELL PUBLIC REGARDING NEW STAFF STRUCTURE'
[19:01] <+LukeAviator> Ah
[19:01] <Faustie> Now we have a new structure, and we've agreed that for now, its all internal
[19:01] <+LukeAviator> I've been thinking of this last night in bed.
[19:01] <Faustie> But we still have people wondering about why there are no SAs
[19:02] <Faustie> So I think we should at least public a message, either saying the situation is resolved, or we've just slightly changed structure for what we believe to be the better
01[19:02] <Termin> Agreed
[19:02] <+Floodify> Agreed
[19:02] <+Enzyme> Inform them that we've made changes, and that we're back and running

Hmm...

[19:10] <+Shadewie> So are we going to grant Fultz and doomdude a rank on the page?
[19:10] <+Shadewie> Or will it stay as it is?
01[19:10] <Termin> Its still internal for now

I do expect an apology.

I am starting to think that the thread was closed to hide the truth.

If admins are going to continue to be bias, I am afraid these may be my last words here, hey, even this thread will probably be closed.