Misunderstanding -Case escalated for SA review.

[User 12049]

If you look at the video 0 shots hit the president and you said they did. I think someone that was not at the event should (Based off evidence) come to the conclusion of the ban otherwise this ban has been unbiased and is just observing the view of one single admin of whom was killed by the person banned will be biased because the ban could been seen as rage this shouldn't be closed until a unbiased admins comes and looks at the hard evidence this should not be overlooked. Furthermore to this, you said I looked like a Civilian, how can a person in a suit look like a civilian. I could of been any job title for that matter.

Thank you for providing sufficient evidence for shooting directly at the president.

1: Is shooting/stabbing a tranquillised body allowed if you have a valid reason to kill them?

2: Does breaking into cars but not actually driving them away count as random stealing if we have a reason to do it? Such as moving a car that's in the way of something, or turning off the radio of a parked car right outside your store.

3: A while back someone kept robbing my store without any real reason other than roleplaying as a robber, and I was told this was fairly reasonable, is this still the case? Can we roleplay as robbers/muggers if it is roleplayed well without having any straight up reason, for example mugging people in dark alleys with a knife for $50?

4: Is putting something in the back of a tides truck considered modifying it if it just simply placed inside?

5: Is reconnecting to repair a crashed vehicle allowed?

---

Until you give me hard evidence(Server logs) that I MASS RDMed (Killed) I don't think it's fair to ban me as all you got is your word of mouth and the only other evidence you got is your RP friends who are being biased and taking your side as you would expect them to. Whereas I've got proof that I didn't hit the president but you said I did hit the pres, which makes your argument invalid.