Character
Rules
Events
Map
RP Points
Proplimits
Statistics
Steam Group
Members
Hall of Fame
Team
Bans
Blacklists
Warnings
Changelog
Content
10-11-2013, 10:07 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:02 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
The reasons have been listed previously, this not a negotiation, you do not get to refuse, the reasons have been listed in communications by myself and Mr Nicholson to your organisation.
As to your reference to the Freedom of Information act, may I remind you of several facts. Namely that Evocity is a constituent of the United States, ergo parliamentary statutes of the United Kingdom do not apply. Secondly as an agency of the United Nations we are only obliged to uphold pertinent laws, and the laws as laid under the articles from the United Nations, under s6(3)d of the article of human rights you are afforded the right to face your accuser, which has been met.
Furthermore the Freedom of Information act, lists the following obligations under s1
''1 General right of access to information held by public authorities.
(1)Any person making a request for information to a public authority is entitled—
(a)to be informed in writing by the public authority whether it holds information of the description specified in the request, and
(b)if that is the case, to have that information communicated to him.
(2)Subsection (1) has effect subject to the following provisions of this section and to the provisions of sections 2, 9, 12 and 14.
(3)Where a public authority—
(a)reasonably requires further information in order to identify and locate the information requested, and
(b)has informed the applicant of that requirement,the authority is not obliged to comply with subsection (1) unless it is supplied with that further information.
(4)The information—
(a)in respect of which the applicant is to be informed under subsection (1)(a), or
(b)which is to be communicated under subsection (1)(b),is the information in question held at the time when the request is received, except that account may be taken of any amendment or deletion made between that time and the time when the information is to be communicated under subsection (1)(b), being an amendment or deletion that would have been made regardless of the receipt of the request.
(5)A public authority is to be taken to have complied with subsection (1)(a) in relation to any information if it has communicated the information to the applicant in accordance with subsection (1)(b).
(6)In this Act, the duty of a public authority to comply with subsection (1)(a) is referred to as “the duty to confirm or deny”.''
As you can see from the above we have no obligation to you under this law, assuming it could even be held applicable to your current situation.
Under s 10 ''10 Time for compliance with request.
(1)Subject to subsections (2) and (3), a public authority must comply with section 1(1) promptly and in any event not later than the twentieth working day following the date of receipt.'' I highlight this to indicate that the 24 hour time frame you indicated is incorrect, and is an attempt to manipulate our offices by subverting the law.
Under section 23 of the aforementioned act.
23 Information supplied by, or relating to, bodies dealing with security matters.
(1)Information held by a public authority is exempt information if it was directly or indirectly supplied to the public authority by, or relates to, any of the bodies specified in subsection (3).
(2)A certificate signed by a Minister of the Crown certifying that the information to which it applies was directly or indirectly supplied by, or relates to, any of the bodies specified in subsection (3) shall, subject to section 60, be conclusive evidence of that fact.
(3)The bodies referred to in subsections (1) and (2) are—
(a)the Security Service,
(b)the Secret Intelligence Service,
©the Government Communications Headquarters,
(d)the special forces,
(e)the Tribunal established under section 65 of the Regulation of M1Investigatory Powers Act 2000,
(f)the Tribunal established under section 7 of the M2Interception of Communications Act 1985,
(g)the Tribunal established under section 5 of the M3Security Service Act 1989,
(h)the Tribunal established under section 9 of the M4Intelligence Services Act 1994,
(i)the Security Vetting Appeals Panel,
(j)the Security Commission,
(k)the National Criminal Intelligence Service, F1. . .
(l)the Service Authority for the National Criminal Intelligence Service.
[(m)the Serious Organised Crime Agency.]
(4)In subsection (3)© “the Government Communications Headquarters” includes any unit or part of a unit of the armed forces of the Crown which is for the time being required by the Secretary of State to assist the Government Communications Headquarters in carrying out its functions.
(5)The duty to confirm or deny does not arise if, or to the extent that, compliance with section 1(1)(a) would involve the disclosure of any information (whether or not already recorded) which was directly or indirectly supplied to the public authority by, or relates to, any of the bodies specified in subsection (3).
As you can see, in the event that this act would apply to the current situation, we are under no obligation to comply, as the Ministry of Peace is a special forces task force from the United Nations.
Further to this under s27, you will see we are further exempt from complying with your request.
27 International relations.
(1)Information is exempt information if its disclosure under this Act would, or would be likely to, prejudice—
(a)relations between the United Kingdom and any other State,
(b)relations between the United Kingdom and any international organisation or international court,
©the interests of the United Kingdom abroad, or
(d)the promotion or protection by the United Kingdom of its interests abroad.
(2)Information is also exempt information if it is confidential information obtained from a State other than the United Kingdom or from an international organisation or international court.
(3)For the purposes of this section, any information obtained from a State, organisation or court is confidential at any time while the terms on which it was obtained require it to be held in confidence or while the circumstances in which it was obtained make it reasonable for the State, organisation or court to expect that it will be so held.
(4)The duty to confirm or deny does not arise if, or to the extent that, compliance with section 1(1)(a)—
(a)would, or would be likely to, prejudice any of the matters mentioned in subsection (1), or
(b)would involve the disclosure of any information (whether or not already recorded) which is confidential information obtained from a State other than the United Kingdom or from an international organisation or international court.
(5)In this section—
“international court” means any international court which is not an international organisation and which is established—
(a)by a resolution of an international organisation of which the United Kingdom is a member, or
(b)by an international agreement to which the United Kingdom is a party;
“international organisation” means any international organisation whose members include any two or more States, or any organ of such an organisation;
“State” includes the government of any State and any organ of its government, and references to a State other than the United Kingdom include references to any territory outside the United Kingdom.
We have stated the reasons for the requirements of your closure multiple times.
I hasten to add, that attempting to confuse the situation by citing irrelevant and inapplicable law in the name of impeding the justice process, will not help your case, or prevent us from taking further affirmative action.
As to your reference to the Freedom of Information act, may I remind you of several facts. Namely that Evocity is a constituent of the United States, ergo parliamentary statutes of the United Kingdom do not apply. Secondly as an agency of the United Nations we are only obliged to uphold pertinent laws, and the laws as laid under the articles from the United Nations, under s6(3)d of the article of human rights you are afforded the right to face your accuser, which has been met.
Furthermore the Freedom of Information act, lists the following obligations under s1
''1 General right of access to information held by public authorities.
(1)Any person making a request for information to a public authority is entitled—
(a)to be informed in writing by the public authority whether it holds information of the description specified in the request, and
(b)if that is the case, to have that information communicated to him.
(2)Subsection (1) has effect subject to the following provisions of this section and to the provisions of sections 2, 9, 12 and 14.
(3)Where a public authority—
(a)reasonably requires further information in order to identify and locate the information requested, and
(b)has informed the applicant of that requirement,the authority is not obliged to comply with subsection (1) unless it is supplied with that further information.
(4)The information—
(a)in respect of which the applicant is to be informed under subsection (1)(a), or
(b)which is to be communicated under subsection (1)(b),is the information in question held at the time when the request is received, except that account may be taken of any amendment or deletion made between that time and the time when the information is to be communicated under subsection (1)(b), being an amendment or deletion that would have been made regardless of the receipt of the request.
(5)A public authority is to be taken to have complied with subsection (1)(a) in relation to any information if it has communicated the information to the applicant in accordance with subsection (1)(b).
(6)In this Act, the duty of a public authority to comply with subsection (1)(a) is referred to as “the duty to confirm or deny”.''
As you can see from the above we have no obligation to you under this law, assuming it could even be held applicable to your current situation.
Under s 10 ''10 Time for compliance with request.
(1)Subject to subsections (2) and (3), a public authority must comply with section 1(1) promptly and in any event not later than the twentieth working day following the date of receipt.'' I highlight this to indicate that the 24 hour time frame you indicated is incorrect, and is an attempt to manipulate our offices by subverting the law.
Under section 23 of the aforementioned act.
23 Information supplied by, or relating to, bodies dealing with security matters.
(1)Information held by a public authority is exempt information if it was directly or indirectly supplied to the public authority by, or relates to, any of the bodies specified in subsection (3).
(2)A certificate signed by a Minister of the Crown certifying that the information to which it applies was directly or indirectly supplied by, or relates to, any of the bodies specified in subsection (3) shall, subject to section 60, be conclusive evidence of that fact.
(3)The bodies referred to in subsections (1) and (2) are—
(a)the Security Service,
(b)the Secret Intelligence Service,
©the Government Communications Headquarters,
(d)the special forces,
(e)the Tribunal established under section 65 of the Regulation of M1Investigatory Powers Act 2000,
(f)the Tribunal established under section 7 of the M2Interception of Communications Act 1985,
(g)the Tribunal established under section 5 of the M3Security Service Act 1989,
(h)the Tribunal established under section 9 of the M4Intelligence Services Act 1994,
(i)the Security Vetting Appeals Panel,
(j)the Security Commission,
(k)the National Criminal Intelligence Service, F1. . .
(l)the Service Authority for the National Criminal Intelligence Service.
[(m)the Serious Organised Crime Agency.]
(4)In subsection (3)© “the Government Communications Headquarters” includes any unit or part of a unit of the armed forces of the Crown which is for the time being required by the Secretary of State to assist the Government Communications Headquarters in carrying out its functions.
(5)The duty to confirm or deny does not arise if, or to the extent that, compliance with section 1(1)(a) would involve the disclosure of any information (whether or not already recorded) which was directly or indirectly supplied to the public authority by, or relates to, any of the bodies specified in subsection (3).
As you can see, in the event that this act would apply to the current situation, we are under no obligation to comply, as the Ministry of Peace is a special forces task force from the United Nations.
Further to this under s27, you will see we are further exempt from complying with your request.
27 International relations.
(1)Information is exempt information if its disclosure under this Act would, or would be likely to, prejudice—
(a)relations between the United Kingdom and any other State,
(b)relations between the United Kingdom and any international organisation or international court,
©the interests of the United Kingdom abroad, or
(d)the promotion or protection by the United Kingdom of its interests abroad.
(2)Information is also exempt information if it is confidential information obtained from a State other than the United Kingdom or from an international organisation or international court.
(3)For the purposes of this section, any information obtained from a State, organisation or court is confidential at any time while the terms on which it was obtained require it to be held in confidence or while the circumstances in which it was obtained make it reasonable for the State, organisation or court to expect that it will be so held.
(4)The duty to confirm or deny does not arise if, or to the extent that, compliance with section 1(1)(a)—
(a)would, or would be likely to, prejudice any of the matters mentioned in subsection (1), or
(b)would involve the disclosure of any information (whether or not already recorded) which is confidential information obtained from a State other than the United Kingdom or from an international organisation or international court.
(5)In this section—
“international court” means any international court which is not an international organisation and which is established—
(a)by a resolution of an international organisation of which the United Kingdom is a member, or
(b)by an international agreement to which the United Kingdom is a party;
“international organisation” means any international organisation whose members include any two or more States, or any organ of such an organisation;
“State” includes the government of any State and any organ of its government, and references to a State other than the United Kingdom include references to any territory outside the United Kingdom.
We have stated the reasons for the requirements of your closure multiple times.
I hasten to add, that attempting to confuse the situation by citing irrelevant and inapplicable law in the name of impeding the justice process, will not help your case, or prevent us from taking further affirmative action.