A Pickle for the Knowing Ones (serious)

[Cygnus]

The banning admin, who is promoted based on the fact they will be objective and unbias, usually has full understanding of the situation and can therefore deal with it appropriately. Misconduct or abuse can be reported.

8 times out of 10, your UBR will be denied unless you can provide solid proof you didn't break the rules.

Awestruck thank you for your quick and explanatory reply. However! There are many issues with this system.

1. The admin who unbanned you is going to have an inherent bias to uphold his own decision lest he be made out a fool!
   
2. Giving admins the potential to close cases they're already linked to gives them the chance to sweep these things under the rug! Although I have no proof, I wonder how many times this has happened and the banned individual could not be bothered to report it!
   
3. Why is it the role of the accused to show there are not in the wrong, what happened to innocent before proven guilty!
   
4. Why do we assume admins will always be objective and unbiased! Many times this has been shown not to be true (not to mention the recent removal of an admin whose name shall not be mentioned!) as by the staggering amount of staff reports!
   
5. You are right! Misconduct can be reported, but it not always is! Staff reports take a lot of time, and most people cannot be bothered! By kicking the bucket of potential staff abuse down the road, we allow potential abuses of power to go unnoticed!
   

Whenever I've been admin on servers they've never let you take your own sits for obvious bias reasons.

Not sure why this semi-DarkRP server wants to put it on a pedestal and pretend its staff are perfect?

An example is that the average player is REQUIRED to have video evidence, but an administrator is not. You do not need any verification as staff.