Character
Rules
Events
Map
RP Points
Proplimits
Statistics
Steam Group
Members
Hall of Fame
Team
Bans
Blacklists
Warnings
Changelog
Content
09-18-2020, 11:13 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:08 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
Hi Dimitris,
I'll break down this report point by point.
Point 1: Big @ call on hotel roof
- A poorly handled @ call does not equal abuse. There are various points surrounding this situation that we will be discussing with Jessixa privately about how this can be handled much better.
- It's not an easy situation to be in when surrounded by big personalities but she needed to take better control of the situation by perhaps not bringing so many people to the discussion at once, as in some cases this is just setting yourself up to fail
- Nobody was punished in the end because the reporters said nevermind and that they now think they did have a valid reason to be killed
- No abuse here from Jessixa, but a point of improvement? Yes.
Point 2: Banning solely on someone's word
- Slaint sent an @ call claiming Xx-Xx was "trying to ddos the server"
- Jessixa teleported to Slaint, who explained "he just spammed invisible vans infront of me"
- The accused player also replied in OOC to Slaint saying "idk how i can ddos the server", from Jessixa's reply to the AA, it appears she misread this as "how can i ddos the server" or something similar.
- Around a minute later, Jessixa issued a 30 day ban for "threaten to DDOS", later extended by Conn.
Log extract:
- Looking back at the logs, the accused player was in fact acting unusual with props and prop spamming moments before Slaint reported him, spawning lots and lots of the same van and pop can over and over, as seen in log extract 2.
Log extract:
- Conclusion: So it appears Slaint reported Xx-Xx "trying to DDoS the server" when he very well may have simply meant the guy was trying to crash the server (with props), then Jessixa misread the OOC comment from Xx-Xx, and having already been suspecting him of DA (correctly), decided to ban him. There's nothing wrong with that.
- No abuse here from Jessixa as it appears to initially be a misunderstanding, but we will just reiterate to her about making sure she's interpreted things correctly, double checking that she's read things properly so that the initial ban reason is as accurate as possible.
Point 3: Not putting DA in the ban reason
- Really minor stuff, not abuse and not a huge issue.
- At the time, she may not have known they were DAs, in which case, she gave a perm ban to two people who were propspamming to try and crash the server (we don't tend to give perms as often these days, but if they were trying to crash the server, so be it. This isn't abusive, they're trying to crash the server.)
- If she did know they were DAs, but just forgot to put that in the reason, then it's just a small case of forgetting to type out the full reason. Not a big deal at all, and certainly not abuse.
Point 4: Rowie UBR
- All she did was say we were taking it into discussion, she didn't deny it or imply it was not eligible for approval.
- The quote from the ban lift thread states that certain bans are entitled to post a UBR and if it's for DA, their main accounts are eligible for unban. However, it also states that you need to mention that you should have been effected by the ban wipe at the beginning of your UBR and if deemed true, the ban will be lifted without discussion. The fact he did not mention this meant that it may not necessarily be an instant approval, and we may have needed to briefly look into the case to confirm. Jessixa did nothing wrong here.
- You would not have reported this if another member of staff replied to the UBR saying the same thing Jessixa did.
- No abuse here.
Conclusion: None of the reported situations are considered abuse. However, there are a few areas in which she can improve her administrative skills. Other than your first point, none of these situations you've brought up have anything to do with you whatsoever and this clearly shows you are just scrounging around looking for as many small mistakes Jessixa makes as possible to try and make us get rid of her or something. We will be giving feedback to her based on some of the points in this report, but we certainly won't be "getting rid of her" based on anything you've brought forwards here. So if that is your only intention, we suggest you invest your time into something else, unless evidence of any actual abuse comes to light. For future reference: https://www.fearlessrp.net/showthread.php?tid=63609
Regards,
Tomo, Edned & Divey
I'll break down this report point by point.
Point 1: Big @ call on hotel roof
- A poorly handled @ call does not equal abuse. There are various points surrounding this situation that we will be discussing with Jessixa privately about how this can be handled much better.
- It's not an easy situation to be in when surrounded by big personalities but she needed to take better control of the situation by perhaps not bringing so many people to the discussion at once, as in some cases this is just setting yourself up to fail
- Nobody was punished in the end because the reporters said nevermind and that they now think they did have a valid reason to be killed
- No abuse here from Jessixa, but a point of improvement? Yes.
Point 2: Banning solely on someone's word
- Slaint sent an @ call claiming Xx-Xx was "trying to ddos the server"
- Jessixa teleported to Slaint, who explained "he just spammed invisible vans infront of me"
- The accused player also replied in OOC to Slaint saying "idk how i can ddos the server", from Jessixa's reply to the AA, it appears she misread this as "how can i ddos the server" or something similar.
- Around a minute later, Jessixa issued a 30 day ban for "threaten to DDOS", later extended by Conn.
Log extract:
Spoiler :
![[Image: m1R0dtO.png]](https://i.imgur.com/m1R0dtO.png)
- Looking back at the logs, the accused player was in fact acting unusual with props and prop spamming moments before Slaint reported him, spawning lots and lots of the same van and pop can over and over, as seen in log extract 2.
Log extract:
Spoiler :
![[Image: RUqcQ7V.png]](https://i.imgur.com/RUqcQ7V.png)
- Conclusion: So it appears Slaint reported Xx-Xx "trying to DDoS the server" when he very well may have simply meant the guy was trying to crash the server (with props), then Jessixa misread the OOC comment from Xx-Xx, and having already been suspecting him of DA (correctly), decided to ban him. There's nothing wrong with that.
- No abuse here from Jessixa as it appears to initially be a misunderstanding, but we will just reiterate to her about making sure she's interpreted things correctly, double checking that she's read things properly so that the initial ban reason is as accurate as possible.
Point 3: Not putting DA in the ban reason
- Really minor stuff, not abuse and not a huge issue.
- At the time, she may not have known they were DAs, in which case, she gave a perm ban to two people who were propspamming to try and crash the server (we don't tend to give perms as often these days, but if they were trying to crash the server, so be it. This isn't abusive, they're trying to crash the server.)
- If she did know they were DAs, but just forgot to put that in the reason, then it's just a small case of forgetting to type out the full reason. Not a big deal at all, and certainly not abuse.
Point 4: Rowie UBR
- All she did was say we were taking it into discussion, she didn't deny it or imply it was not eligible for approval.
- The quote from the ban lift thread states that certain bans are entitled to post a UBR and if it's for DA, their main accounts are eligible for unban. However, it also states that you need to mention that you should have been effected by the ban wipe at the beginning of your UBR and if deemed true, the ban will be lifted without discussion. The fact he did not mention this meant that it may not necessarily be an instant approval, and we may have needed to briefly look into the case to confirm. Jessixa did nothing wrong here.
- You would not have reported this if another member of staff replied to the UBR saying the same thing Jessixa did.
- No abuse here.
Conclusion: None of the reported situations are considered abuse. However, there are a few areas in which she can improve her administrative skills. Other than your first point, none of these situations you've brought up have anything to do with you whatsoever and this clearly shows you are just scrounging around looking for as many small mistakes Jessixa makes as possible to try and make us get rid of her or something. We will be giving feedback to her based on some of the points in this report, but we certainly won't be "getting rid of her" based on anything you've brought forwards here. So if that is your only intention, we suggest you invest your time into something else, unless evidence of any actual abuse comes to light. For future reference: https://www.fearlessrp.net/showthread.php?tid=63609
Regards,
Tomo, Edned & Divey
![[Image: tgRQtsH.png]](https://i.imgur.com/tgRQtsH.png)