Rule 2.8

[Random]

Criminal was stopped because it does not accurately describe what you are role playing nor does it show or explain any of your past, present or future intentions. It fails to show any affiliations with anyone which became a very large issue just like it did with Classified.

Case study

Bob Jim and Fred are all criminals they have not roleplayed together but since they all have the same job title they help each other out in a raid. Admin Frank comes along to deal with the obvious rule infringement that occurred but is unable to prove anything because Bob Jim and Fred all have the same job title.

-support to allowing these lazy ass jobs such as thug and criminal, what’s wrong with creating a gang with some backstory or being a petty thief or thinking of a job title which actually tells people what you are role playing as?

The main issue with it is that in reality we don't see detailed gangs with decent backstory, if any backstory at all in the vast majority of cases.

In reality a criminal can burglar homes, assist in raids, assassinate the dictator, rob people for $500 in alleyways, etc. 
This allows for more freedom for said player.

I think that is the exact issue they are trying to get across. A 'Criminal' is too vague, and I honestly agree with it, especially after reading Rickets' case study..