Tobacco sauce

[danbidz]

ACCUSED PLAYER:

First and foremost, your evidence is missing sound. You commenting with text what is happening is false evidence.

Summary of situation:
ilXxCoYz walks armed to the door first dressed as a girl with the jobname Undercover Police officer. (In which you can see in the video)
He/She asks if we sell drugs I answered NO!
He/She then changed back to Regular Police Uniform and came back with Danbidz.
I told the both officers in which you would had heard if the audio on the Evidence was there and not fastforwarded.
Danbidz then goes on about that we have contra inside in which he did not hear neither see.
I told him that he was harrasing me by loitering outside the hallway to hear what he thought was contraband.

His evidence starts. (Video)
He says he hears a knife destroying contraband (You can not see any contraband being destroyed during all video)
Walks back in third person view taking a sneakpeak to see if the corleone returns to fire?
Makes search warrant over contraband.
Rams and rushes in to see me with a Knife on my own property just moving some barrels.
I feel threatened as they rush into my room with guns.
You taze me.
Your friend ilXxCoYz walks into the bathroom and hits (Unkown object)
You arrest me and here we are.

1.  Please upload the footage before i walked away when you used 3rd vision to look inside my appartment.

2. Contra-basing as BMD is not a Rulebreakage. 

8.6 Do not contra-base as any of the jobs listed: Government members, Citizen, Chauffeur, Delivery Driver, Chef, Security Guard, Doctor or Mechanic (an exception being a Citizen with a custom job that fits the roleplay situation)

3. Which Exploit did I use to gain access to my house?

4. You did not get multiple calls about contraband.(Earlier footage will prove) You did not check my ID to see that I was indeed the owner of the house.

5. You broke rule 6.4

Do not randomly search a property; you must have probable cause. Some examples include: Gunfire heard or seen coming from within the property (i.e. contraband); Criminal activity visible on the property; A suspect on the property.

You cant prove that you heard or saw contraband inside my appartment (Can you prove that it wasn't just a breach that was rammed)

6. Editing footage is against the rules.

The logs will disprove everything you just said.
The footage isn't edited, mearly sped up.
You see contraband being destroy through the the wall in the video by other officer (logs will also show)
We were told by one citizen and one of my officers said they heard the contraband.. the officer I was with in the footage.

As regards to my "third person into your property" I just didn't. So there you go, unless you can prove it

As regards to my "random raid" the reason I raised was because I literally heard you destroying contraband and swinging knife, and my other officer heard it earlier in, which gives us a reason. We should of raided you the second we heard it, but we wanted to be 100% sure there was contra, thus us investigating and don't you try to deny the fact that contraband was in that house as that is just straight up lieing.

And although you have, for some reason, you tried to turn this on me you still have not explained how YOU GOT INTO YOUR PROPERTY which the whole BR is about, so why don't you answer that question?

On a note about my sound, my software records 5 mins into the past, unfortunately, for reason I don't know, it doesn't record sound UNLESS I start recording manually, I didn't expect to have to be recording as nothing was gonna come from this situation until we heard you destroying the contraband.

Now you are lieing to justify your rule break which you have failed to explan, if you feel we broke the rules. Place your own PR. Don't try justifying your rule break by saying "they did it first" without providing evidence.