06-19-2017, 11:51 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:06 AM by Fearless Community. Edited 2 times in total.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
Regarding this BR:
https://fearlessrp.net/showthread.php?tid=81361
I dont want to comment anything else about the case but i was surprised by Jonas statement:
Is this the precedent you want to set? Is it allowed now for a raider to get into the nexus as "Janitor" and then kill the president, claiming he was undercover all along? (if roleplayed correctly ofcourse). In my opinion thats a very bad change and brings us back to the "classified" jobname problem. In think jobnames should always accuratly state the job of the character you are roleplaying.
9.1 Custom job titles must accurately state what character you intend to roleplay.
https://fearlessrp.net/showthread.php?tid=81361
I dont want to comment anything else about the case but i was surprised by Jonas statement:
(06-19-2017, 08:32 PM)Jonas Wrote: We were undercover Ace Industries members, with our jobs set correctly, as another corporation; Walkers Incorporated. We spied with a different company so you'd never know it was Ace.
Is this the precedent you want to set? Is it allowed now for a raider to get into the nexus as "Janitor" and then kill the president, claiming he was undercover all along? (if roleplayed correctly ofcourse). In my opinion thats a very bad change and brings us back to the "classified" jobname problem. In think jobnames should always accuratly state the job of the character you are roleplaying.
9.1 Custom job titles must accurately state what character you intend to roleplay.