[Nighthawk editing rules] GHOSTK1LL3R's UBR[With screengrabs]
#9
(01-03-2016, 02:43 AM)Grub Wrote: Failure to follow proper protocol,

Ban reopened. Apologize for any issues that may of arisen from such case. However, Case failed to meet requirements within staff team, thus was reopened on the date of 

January Second, 2016.

The staff team will be upholding a proper area in which such ban can be discussed, as it was not properly discussed prior to closing of this case.

Thank you,

Grub

This is complete bias. This unban request has been closed and approved by the owner himself. You are completly abusing your power which is pathetic. 

You state that 'case failed to meet requirements within the staff team'  explain to me what the 'requirements' are and we'll see if any of those requirements meet those of what Hitmans case was when he broke FearRP : http://fearlessrp.net/showthread.php?tid=64738. Half the staff team disagreed and said he broke FearRP.

I was going to let this slide Grub with the bullshit in this case but if you want to bring it up I will make sure you and everyone who is as bias as you goes down with it.


Back to the thread(Which has already been approved) Nighthawk you say:

'If you notice in the first GHOST those are two completely different posts. One is an old post and the other is a more recent one. Grub had asked me a while ago to make a decision on the case as he was looking over it as well. I attempted to edit it in the first place to make easier for some people to copy and paste the template.'

So you want everyone to believe that on the day of the banning of myself you decided that out of the goodness of your heart you'd alter the unban request section change the template for the unban requests to make it easier to 'copy and paste' and somehow while that happened the rules would change from 'fourm ban' to 'perma ban' and you would have nothing to do with this?

Alright, lets follow your story with you saying you edited the template easier to 'copy and paste'.

Link to Cashe Version:
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/se...php?tid=10

Cashe version 1:
[Image: cd29743e7e330682f146ec227dfc79d4.png]
Cashe version 2:
[Image: 3547f9966ca2249c94c068d723763ba9.png]

Live version link:
http://www.fearlessrp.net/showthread.php?tid=10

Live version 1:
[Image: ffb931531e34bb41595b4a68ac205397.png]

Live version 2:
[Image: a833596a99504caeee82e978313d6aee.png]

Now compare versions 1 together and version's 2 together, does anyone here spot any differences? I don't, not one work altered not one space added, don't believe me look at the links yourself. You also state you say 'attempted'. If you 'attempted' it and wasn't able to do anything then it wouldn't of said you altered it, of which you did.


Remember Nighthawk this is the second time you have lied in the courthouse and it seems that the rules are perma ban-able for that so make sure you're telling the truth because it's blatant you're lying out your ass.


Messages In This Thread
RE: ubr - by NightHawkd - 01-01-2016, 03:45 AM
RE: ubr - by User 12049 - 01-01-2016, 10:16 AM
RE: ubr - by User 12049 - 01-01-2016, 10:23 AM
RE: [Nighthawk editing rules] GHOSTK1LL3R's UBR[With screengrabs] - by User 12049 - 01-03-2016, 09:47 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)