Falcao moderator abuse
#8
(12-07-2015, 10:16 PM)Falcao Wrote:
(12-07-2015, 10:11 PM)Jericho Wrote:
(12-07-2015, 10:00 PM)Falcao Wrote:
(12-07-2015, 09:23 PM)Jericho Wrote: No weapons were being open carried until our base was molotov'd and breached into with gunshots. If this was infact the reason for the raid then Falcao would have stated so upon confrontation.

But I have no reason to give you all these reason as to why until now. I also stated afterwards that we did infact raid for weapons too but you didn't add that chat did ya?

That's all I got to say really.

[FL:M] Falcao

You've completely ignored my point by trying to sneak your way out of it - making up that we were open carrying weapons. NOBODY was open-carrying any firearms within the base until we were attacked upon in a very unprofessional manner, most especially from what you claim "Government" force. There were no police officers present in the situation, no ramming, no negotiating just our base molotov'd by a group of men armed with galils followed with gunshots at anyone within the premises.

If you have any video footage or images of us open carrying then feel free to post it.

The search warrant can justify that the raid was not for weapons and the damage logs can also prove that we were fired upon first.

Not sneaking my way out of anything, my raid reasons are completely valid, the way I went about it was fine also. I sent the warrant into the current president and we did not call officers or SRU because we took control of the situation, you did infact carry weapons in the open also.

The "Fences" are still high, as I stated that was the intended reason. But as soon as we arrived we saw the weapons and then that took our priorities over, so we raided for you carrying weaponry which was illegal. A shot was fired from your window and the ground, that's when we molotoved the fence and ran in. When we got to the stairs rebels were stood with guns pointing at us and then the firefight opened.

Every part of this was completely valid and I've done nothing wrong whatsoever.

[FL:M] Falcao

Unless you have any evidence regarding the events you are claiming then feel free to post them. But based from the evidence that I have provided it is clearly apparent that you've merely raided for the non-existant "high walls" that you claim; despite being proven wrong by another member of staff.

You state:

"The "Fences" are still high, as I stated that was the intended reason."

And Avgar has clearly stated that they could be 'high'

(*>>) (Answer) [FL] AvGarland: No, they are not. Fences are see
through and can be high.

Fences not being 'high walls' have already been debated countless times within the forums and with your position I would expect you to be aware of that. This can be proven in the following thread:

http://www.fearlessrp.net/showthread.php...ght=fences


Messages In This Thread
Falcao moderator abuse - by Jericho - 12-07-2015, 09:05 PM
RE: Falcao moderator abuse - by Falc - 12-07-2015, 09:11 PM
RE: Falcao moderator abuse - by Balls - 12-07-2015, 09:16 PM
RE: Falcao moderator abuse - by Jericho - 12-07-2015, 09:23 PM
RE: Falcao moderator abuse - by Falc - 12-07-2015, 10:00 PM
RE: Falcao moderator abuse - by Jericho - 12-07-2015, 10:11 PM
RE: Falcao moderator abuse - by Falc - 12-07-2015, 10:16 PM
RE: Falcao moderator abuse - by Jericho - 12-07-2015, 10:43 PM
RE: Falcao moderator abuse - by Random - 12-07-2015, 10:54 PM
RE: Falcao moderator abuse - by Mike - 12-07-2015, 10:59 PM
RE: Falcao moderator abuse - by Jericho - 12-09-2015, 08:12 AM
RE: Falcao moderator abuse - by Avgar - 12-08-2015, 08:29 AM
RE: Falcao moderator abuse - by Jericho - 12-09-2015, 05:19 PM
RE: Falcao moderator abuse - by Mike - 12-09-2015, 12:37 PM
RE: Falcao moderator abuse - by Villain - 12-09-2015, 01:34 PM
RE: Falcao moderator abuse - by Falc - 12-09-2015, 03:24 PM
RE: Falcao moderator abuse - by Jericho - 12-23-2015, 12:42 AM
RE: Falcao moderator abuse - by Hitman - 12-23-2015, 01:45 AM
RE: Falcao moderator abuse - by Infernaw - 01-26-2016, 06:21 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)