Character
Rules
Events
Map
RP Points
Proplimits
Statistics
Steam Group
Members
Hall of Fame
Team
Bans
Blacklists
Warnings
Changelog
Content
10-13-2015, 09:07 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:04 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
If you pay attention to exactly what he said, it becomes evident that he is primarily saying that he was at fault for two things:
The first, is that his job description was too vague, in which I completely disagree with him. Its was sufficiently descriptive for his character and fulfilled everything necessary in my book to understand what he was doing. All of this is described in the above post.
The second is that he didn't necessarily pick the best course of action. Which is a very subjective thing. Did he need to pull the gun? No. But did he violate any rules for pulling the gun? No, he did not. This is also elaborated on in my above post.
He is not saying he broke rules, but he acknowledges that there could be some less than ideal things that occurred from his actions. What I am saying is, regardless of how the situation unfolded, there was absolutely no rule breakage. Hence, he should be unbanned.
The first, is that his job description was too vague, in which I completely disagree with him. Its was sufficiently descriptive for his character and fulfilled everything necessary in my book to understand what he was doing. All of this is described in the above post.
The second is that he didn't necessarily pick the best course of action. Which is a very subjective thing. Did he need to pull the gun? No. But did he violate any rules for pulling the gun? No, he did not. This is also elaborated on in my above post.
He is not saying he broke rules, but he acknowledges that there could be some less than ideal things that occurred from his actions. What I am saying is, regardless of how the situation unfolded, there was absolutely no rule breakage. Hence, he should be unbanned.