MA on [FL:M]Falcao

[Mr.SkarKasm]

It's nobodies fault here. Its personal opinions clashing with each other when talking about the really vague rule that is "No Doombases". Thats it. It simply says, "Doombases are not allowed". No accurate description of a doombase or even a rubric on what to do and what not to do. And what that leads to instead of a factual judgement on the doombase is an opinionated judgement based on the admins own standpoint on what is and is not a doombase.

The problem here is as simple as the solution; Make a individual section in the rules on what constitutes a doombase or not. Whether it be soul's example that you need a realistic support structure along with no clear advantage for the person using the sniper tower, or whatever else deemed fit by higher administration. Nobody needs to be demoted for stating their personal opinion on what a doombase is when there is not even a clear description of what a doombase is, that's just redundant.

To sum what I said up; Nobody should be at fault for stating an opinion since there is no factual description of a doombase in the rules. Therefor its the administrators opinion on if it is a doombase, not some clear guideline on what is and is not. And we need to make a individual section in the rules for what makes a doombase a doombase.

read the rules that are on the website itself it goes even deeper if that's what you meant