Unfair Ban

[Jinkees!]

v33x [18:06:45] [FL:RP] equal (STEAM_0:1:40601685) said: That can be arranged.
v33x [18:07:14] [FL:RP] equal (STEAM_0:1:40601685) said: /radio CEASE FIRE
v33x [18:07:16] [FL:RP] equal (STEAM_0:1:40601685) said: /radio CEASE FIRE!!!
v33x [18:07:18] [FL:RP] equal (STEAM_0:1:40601685) said: /radio CEASE FIRE!!!
v33x [18:07:20] [FL:RP] equal (STEAM_0:1:40601685) said: /radio CEASE FIRE!!!
v33x [18:07:27] [FL:RP] equal (STEAM_0:1:40601685) said: /inventory health_kit use 1
v33x [18:07:28] [FL:RP] equal (STEAM_0:1:40601685) has used 1 health_kit
v33x [18:07:29] [FL:RP] equal (STEAM_0:1:40601685) said: /me uses a healthpack to heal his wounds.
v33x [18:07:34] [FL:RP] equal (STEAM_0:1:40601685) said: /radio CEASE FIRE, I AM HELD CAPTIVE.

Those are the logs from the time you barged out of the elevator firstly breaking fearrp with the other officers whom died due to the breaking of it.

We were not told that the hostage was to stay in the lobby but that we were going to our house in where he will be released.

FearRP technically did apply due to the fact that the only reason it was off in the first place was because you broke it when you barged out of the elevator shooting us.

Mm, actually, I'll be happy to own up to that first instance. Though, it was a mistake. I was not paying attention to the chat. 
But what do you mean "Technically still applied?".
NLR is also a rule, GeneralRickets, but if a player were to be killed by someone breaking NLR, they'd still have to abide by the NLR 10 minutes. Meaning that even if you are disadvantaged by a rule, through someone else breaking that same rule - it is still in effect?

Furthermore, I still await evidence of the private message between you and the unnamed player, as well as an explanation as to how we were to know the admin mafia's sudden decision change of where to leave the hostage.