Rule that needs clarifying.
#15
(11-25-2012, 04:34 PM)Adman Wrote:
(11-25-2012, 04:16 PM)trouserlessliam Wrote:
(11-25-2012, 02:11 PM)Adman Wrote: Best defence is to own a large base, thereby 'stuffing' your contraband at the back, if you're contrafarming in the city in tiny apartments then you're at higher risk. At the end of the day, with ANY ambiguity regarding rules; ask an administrator online before taking an action you're not quite sure on its legitimacy.

But everytime they have done this they were banned for breaking fearRP.

If they were banned for breaking FearRP then they did something to break that, everything I wrote above has no relevance to FearRP I don't see where you're coming from...

Not sure either. But still, what Craig said is true. He was based in the MTL, and had his contraband hidden well away. The rule is a good concept. It's just that it is so unverifiable, that it can be abused the hell out of. How can I say someone else didn't hear something?


Messages In This Thread
Rule that needs clarifying. - by jimmyboyo - 11-24-2012, 08:25 PM
RE: Rule that needs clarifying. - by Excalibur - 11-24-2012, 09:20 PM
RE: Rule that needs clarifying. - by Excalibur - 11-24-2012, 09:44 PM
RE: Rule that needs clarifying. - by Knight - 11-25-2012, 12:09 AM
RE: Rule that needs clarifying. - by Craig447 - 11-25-2012, 01:15 AM
RE: Rule that needs clarifying. - by Craig447 - 11-25-2012, 01:49 AM
RE: Rule that needs clarifying. - by Adman - 11-25-2012, 02:11 PM
RE: Rule that needs clarifying. - by Craig447 - 11-25-2012, 03:15 PM
RE: Rule that needs clarifying. - by Adman - 11-25-2012, 04:34 PM
RE: Rule that needs clarifying. - by jimmyboyo - 11-25-2012, 04:36 PM
RE: Rule that needs clarifying. - by Craig447 - 11-25-2012, 05:45 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)