Doomforting Falcao

[Joykill]

Earlier MrSir had a set of props that were basic defences, but because of the material, they were completely impossible to see where everything was. I couldnt tell the front most defence from the back wall. I told him it was doomforting and that he had to change the colors. Here, on the back walls, I see that the same set up is on the hallways. In that sense, I would say it is doomforting. Not to mention the hallways was constantly filled up with fire from molotovs, which prevented anyone from entering without them taking a load of damage first.

Also I would like this to be more of a topic about editing the definition of a doom fort, rather than he broke rules, which he didn't, because rule wise this isn't a doomfort.

Doomforting right now is very vague, and needs to be properly defined.

Funny how when it's an administrator who is accused, we suddenly need to make drastic changes to the rules. People, right now, are punished for this time and time again, and has been for a number of years now. 
How can you in the same post say it doesn't break any rules, and that doomforting isn't even defined? I don't get your reasoning here? How is this not breaking anything rule-wise? 

Of course you'd like it to be a discussion about the rule, not the administrator. We've tried. I called specifying many vague rules for a long long time, but never has picked up.

I don't think there is much of a point in discussing whether this is a doomfort, then the very definition of one doesn't exist. As such, I'm not arguing for either side on whether this is doomforting.