MA on [FL:M]Falcao - Printable Version +- Fearless Forums (https://fearlessrp.net) +-- Forum: The Courthouse (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=13) +--- Forum: Staff Report (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=22) +---- Forum: Closed (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=89) +---- Thread: MA on [FL:M]Falcao (/showthread.php?tid=65053) |
RE: MA on [FL:M]Falcao - Mr.SkarKasm - 10-05-2015 (10-05-2015, 10:42 PM)kimo kamal (vito salieri ) Wrote: this was sent to me in a PM by another player that i wont show his name now, about the real thing right now first off apparently falcao didn't read the rules nor the mods that approved of this dupe made by a very well known GHOSTK1LL3R which means how unprofissional falcao and the other mods are 2nd thing is the errors on the buildings it says dont either build on the building nor try to get on the rooftops in which case that is ghostkiller's fault that's all what i will have to say for now thank you anonymous who sent me this RE: MA on [FL:M]Falcao - User 12049 - 10-06-2015 Ok. The dupe didn't even need to be approved because I made sure it followed the rules. Soul stated my dupe(of a sniper tower) 'looked mingy'. It doesn't state how it's meant to look in the rules. Also, from the photo presented and quoted it shows the sniper tower in question from one side. The sniper tower is supported. Onto building on the roofs. You can hardly comment on this as you see errors but what was on there was fencing(to stop people jumping onto the roof) and a radio mask. The place we're at is called the radio tower so I decided to put a radio poll on it. - Ghost RE: MA on [FL:M]Falcao - Mr.SkarKasm - 10-06-2015 (10-06-2015, 03:17 PM)GHOSTK1LL3R Wrote: Ok. The dupe didn't even need to be approved because I made sure it followed the rules. Soul stated my dupe(of a sniper tower) 'looked mingy'. It doesn't state how it's meant to look in the rules. Also, from the photo presented and quoted it shows the sniper tower in question from one side. The sniper tower is supported. so you are saying that it wasn't approved? you said that other mods approved it! you are a lier PLUS read the rules that are on the website itself it goes DEEPLY into what these things mean it says never even build on buildings so why build on it? just report people who get on the rooftops that is obviously a way of backseat administration ( look at me getting more and more facts by this thread as i go ) RE: MA on [FL:M]Falcao - User 12049 - 10-06-2015 (10-06-2015, 03:21 PM)kimo kamal (vito salieri ) Wrote:Nope, my words are 'he dupe didn't even need to be approved'. I never stated it wasn't approved. I know it goes deeply into what things mean, that's what I base my dupes off.(10-06-2015, 03:17 PM)GHOSTK1LL3R Wrote: Ok. The dupe didn't even need to be approved because I made sure it followed the rules. Soul stated my dupe(of a sniper tower) 'looked mingy'. It doesn't state how it's meant to look in the rules. Also, from the photo presented and quoted it shows the sniper tower in question from one side. The sniper tower is supported. As stated here in one of my replies : Howdy there, Ghost again(guy who made the dupe)! Right, before this admin abuse case continues on I would like to point out this base is not a doomfort. It breaks zero rules. There is not one rule that can be quoted and used against the dupe, I made sure of that while I was making it. This is a quote from the explanations of doomforting 'Walkways and sniper/guard towers are allowed, both with and without defensive walls to guard you from bullets. However, be cautious, because it's tempting to combine this with features such as fading firing positions, or over-powered use of one-way glass in a guard tower. If you use one-way glass in one of these structures, you must not be able to fire from such a position or near it.' The tower in question, blocked bullets(which is allowed); it had no fading fire positions(had no fading doors at-all); it had no one-way glass in the tower either. The tower was completely valid and is allowed. Soul, your dupe you has presented first dosen't even work( last time I checked them ladders can't be climbed). Just because you(Soul) don't like the looks of the tower. 'It looks mingey' was your words doesn't means it's a doomfort. That photo you presented is a tower that has been made to look nice but is ineffected. The tower I have made is effected and follows the rules. Just because it doesn't look as pretty as your dupe Soul does not make the dupe doomfort. I personally cannot sit here and watch Falcao get punished for firstly a dupe he didn't made and a dupe that abides by the rules. Not to mention that he wasn't the only mod/admin to approve the dupe. The dupe of the sniper tower does not break any rules and the result of this shouldn't be punishment and if there is any it should be on me. - Ghost( I am relevant in this case as I made the dupe) Also, the building on the fences was allowed and the radio part. Again, it's to stop people jumping onto the roof. RE: MA on [FL:M]Falcao - Mr.SkarKasm - 10-06-2015 (10-06-2015, 03:26 PM)GHOSTK1LL3R Wrote:(10-06-2015, 03:21 PM)kimo kamal (vito salieri ) Wrote:Nope, my words are 'he dupe didn't even need to be approved'. I never stated it wasn't approved. I know it goes deeply into what things mean, that's what I base my dupes off.(10-06-2015, 03:17 PM)GHOSTK1LL3R Wrote: Ok. The dupe didn't even need to be approved because I made sure it followed the rules. Soul stated my dupe(of a sniper tower) 'looked mingy'. It doesn't state how it's meant to look in the rules. Also, from the photo presented and quoted it shows the sniper tower in question from one side. The sniper tower is supported. it says dont even build on it! dude cant you read? plus if somebody with a molotov comes along and burns it it will be more than easy to access RE: MA on [FL:M]Falcao - User 12049 - 10-06-2015 (10-06-2015, 03:36 PM)kimo kamal (vito salieri ) Wrote:That logic makes no sense. The reason the fencing is there is to stop people jumping over there in the first place. Also, I can read thank you very much, the person who can't read if yourself as noticed by you thinking I didn't require mod approval. Next time you state an argument. State the argument; don't be an asshole about it.(10-06-2015, 03:26 PM)GHOSTK1LL3R Wrote:(10-06-2015, 03:21 PM)kimo kamal (vito salieri ) Wrote:Nope, my words are 'he dupe didn't even need to be approved'. I never stated it wasn't approved. I know it goes deeply into what things mean, that's what I base my dupes off.(10-06-2015, 03:17 PM)GHOSTK1LL3R Wrote: Ok. The dupe didn't even need to be approved because I made sure it followed the rules. Soul stated my dupe(of a sniper tower) 'looked mingy'. It doesn't state how it's meant to look in the rules. Also, from the photo presented and quoted it shows the sniper tower in question from one side. The sniper tower is supported. RE: MA on [FL:M]Falcao - Grub - 10-09-2015 This isn't a doomfort. Bringing up the definition only helps Falcao in this case. Walkways and sniper/guard towers are allowed, both with and without defensive walls to guard you from bullets. Case concluded. |