Lab Props - Printable Version +- Fearless Forums (https://fearlessrp.net) +-- Forum: CityRP Server (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Forum: Suggestions (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +---- Forum: Approved (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=60) +---- Thread: Lab Props (/showthread.php?tid=99372) |
Lab Props - The Bunkerman - 10-29-2021 Title of Suggestion: Lab Props Description https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2640239955 I've compiled a small collection of props that I think would be nice to have on the server, containing all your favourite lab-themed props and computer equipment. Why? There aren't that many props on the server when it comes to lab stuff, and I think it could really add to roleplay to have some. Whether you're a forensic scientist analysing samples in a lab or a shady drug lord who cooks illegal pharmaceuticals for breakfast, or just a doctor in a hospital; there's loads of situations that these props can fit into. The prop pack uncompressed is about 85MB, and contains around 150 props. I can add more props to the pack if people think they'll be beneficial. RE: Lab Props - TheSiphon - 10-29-2021 +support I swear there was some science pack added before as well but it got removed or something. Also some of the props look familiar since they used to be on the server in the Black Mesa pack. RE: Lab Props - Joe Joe - 10-29-2021 (10-29-2021, 07:38 PM)TheSiphon Wrote: +support There were lab props before but during the content re-evaluation they were deemed unnecessary, was a big sad RE: Lab Props - Marty - 10-29-2021 +Support Breaking bad RP hype. RE: Lab Props - Slaint - 10-30-2021 RE: Lab Props - Boonan - 10-30-2021 +Support RE: Lab Props - Marty - 10-31-2021 (10-29-2021, 07:38 PM)TheSiphon Wrote: +support Lab pack was added with the lab coats I'm sure ? RE: Lab Props - Enclave - 11-13-2021 +Support RE: Lab Props - Pollux - 01-25-2022 Approved I'll add it in when I do content as people seem to want it, this isn't really anything that needs to be discussed much either so I don't see a point in bringing it to review. |