OMG Ωmega - Printable Version +- Fearless Forums (https://fearlessrp.net) +-- Forum: The Courthouse (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=13) +--- Forum: Player Report (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +---- Forum: Approved (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=29) +---- Thread: OMG Ωmega (/showthread.php?tid=96674) |
RE: OMG Ωmega - ChoCho - 09-14-2020 (09-14-2020, 03:21 PM)ART Wrote: Wondering how locking doors is breaking nlr ? if he really wanted them not to leave he would also close the garage i guess. also they dont even said anything about the doors in the video and now talking on the forum.. sad story boys So I can raid nexus and lock them in when I do it next time? What if you was a rebel and got locked in and it resulted with you in dying. I won't say it again, stop insulting me, be mature, and wait for a conclusion. RE: OMG Ωmega - ART - 09-14-2020 (09-14-2020, 03:45 PM)ChoCho Wrote:(09-14-2020, 03:21 PM)ART Wrote: Wondering how locking doors is breaking nlr ? if he really wanted them not to leave he would also close the garage i guess. also they dont even said anything about the doors in the video and now talking on the forum.. sad story boys RE: OMG Ωmega - ChoCho - 09-14-2020 (09-14-2020, 03:53 PM)ART Wrote:(09-14-2020, 03:45 PM)ChoCho Wrote:(09-14-2020, 03:21 PM)ART Wrote: Wondering how locking doors is breaking nlr ? if he really wanted them not to leave he would also close the garage i guess. also they dont even said anything about the doors in the video and now talking on the forum.. sad story boys Omega insulted me, now we asked him to leave, then he locked the door? Wait for the admin for christ sake RE: OMG Ωmega - Falc - 09-14-2020 Player report approved. It’s a rule break, but is it severe enough to deserve punishment? I don’t think so. Just for the future, always question your move twice when it comes to NLR, because whether it’s minor or major, it can end up worse. A side note for everyone involved, no need to make things personal and start making the targeting claims which results in side arguments that aren’t required, let’s just try to be a little more mature in these situations please. Thanks. |