+- Fearless Forums (https://fearlessrp.net)
+-- Forum: General Discussion (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=10)
+--- Forum: Discussions (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+---- Forum: Archive (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=481)
+---- Thread: MadCow vs CW (/showthread.php?tid=94312)
MadCow vs CW - Soviethooves - 09-30-2019
So why does everyone think CW 2.0 is inferior to MadCow when it’s fairly obvious it’s a far better system that benefits RP aggressive and passive.
Was kinda de-railing the other discussion so here we go.
Also, please add actual criticism instead of “CW BaD OwO REEE”
RE: MadCow vs CW - JONATHANPOO - 09-30-2019
not what FL needs not saying dont like the whole thing. just doesmt suit fl
RE: MadCow vs CW - konsta - 10-01-2019
I like Madcow's simplicity
RE: MadCow vs CW - Panda - 10-01-2019
Yeah don’t even mention cw, it is inferior. Nothing better than just whipping out a madcow galil and mass RDMing.
RE: MadCow vs CW - Luna - 10-01-2019
Yeah holdup bro putting my acog sight with extended clip on!! CW won’t work, suggested and denied every time
RE: MadCow vs CW - SpaghettiFTW - 10-01-2019
I prefer the current weapons for simplicity - you buy a gun and that’s what you get. I just don’t think cw has any sort of compatibility with FL - that said though I do think a model update for the guns would be good since they look like they’re from 1993
RE: MadCow vs CW - Soviethooves - 10-01-2019
Can the people that supported MadCow or CW respond with your reasons?
RE: MadCow vs CW - Conn - 10-02-2019
At one point, FL did have CW. I liked certain aspects and didn't like others.
For me, simplifying ammo is key, just keeping rifle/sniper/shotty/pistol would be good.
Also, with the attachments, they should be categorised as maybe 4 or 5 simple choices, scopes/barrels/grips/etc.
All in all, I thought the weapons were absolutely brilliant to use, much more immersive than MC, and the textures were much more detailed. I think people worry about having MC taken away from them because of the exploitable nature of them - crouching for laser aim, for example. It takes away from the fun of it all with extremely basic weaponry.
The weapons currently are absolutely horrendous, too. People will cry about this point, I bet, but they're completely broken and awfully balanced. Shotguns can be used long range quite successfully, and there's the inherent problems with laser bullet fire.
People find it fun because they can abuse it to get a high kill-count. It's a shame that not many people like it, but I really don't understand why.
RE: MadCow vs CW - JONATHANPOO - 10-02-2019
(10-02-2019, 10:47 AM)Conn Wrote: At one point, FL did have CW. I liked certain aspects and didn't like others.
For me, simplifying ammo is key, just keeping rifle/sniper/shotty/pistol would be good.
Also, with the attachments, they should be categorised as maybe 4 or 5 simple choices, scopes/barrels/grips/etc.
All in all, I thought the weapons were absolutely brilliant to use, much more immersive than MC, and the textures were much more detailed. I think people worry about having MC taken away from them because of the exploitable nature of them - crouching for laser aim, for example. It takes away from the fun of it all with extremely basic weaponry.
The weapons currently are absolutely horrendous, too. People will cry about this point, I bet, but they're completely broken and awfully balanced. Shotguns can be used long range quite successfully, and there's the inherent problems with laser bullet fire.
People find it fun because they can abuse it to get a high kill-count. It's a shame that not many people like it, but I really don't understand why.
yeah we find it so fun tbh, just let us have our fun lmao
CW is just bad and not cool
RE: MadCow vs CW - Kappatalist - 10-02-2019
I can mostly agree with Conn. I'm no great fan of all the attachments and ammo, but what we have now isn't great and we could really do with a change