(05-08-2018, 08:26 PM)Pollux Wrote: I think people really don't realise that FPS will not magically improve by switching maps to either V2D or pines, seriously there won't be much of a difference. V5P is so much more optimised than V4B1 and V33X, we were promised good FPS on it and look where that brought us. For those voting for V2D you're going to give us a super ugly map that still has bad frames. (you're only looking at 5-10more FPS) At least pines looks good and still should give us 5FPS more than what we currently have. It's just annoying that as soon as we switch you're going to get the other side going "omg I told you so frames suck" as no map is going to help deal with the FPS problems that lie within a gamemode .

(05-08-2018, 08:17 PM)Joe Joe Wrote: FPS this, FPS that. Change your bell. After testing it, this map will have better than V5P which was bettering than V33X and V4B1. Yes V2D has the best FPS however Id rather have some lower frames than a map that is terribly constructed with many missing and incomplete areas. Some areas have work put in where some just look like they were thrown together when the creator was drunk.

And In response to "Born in 3x and made in V2D". Yes I was born in the past but want to play in the FUTURE, and V2D is not the future of FL. It got the chance to be the future many a time. However it failed. So stop taking steps backwards and move forward. Learn how to Aggressive and Passive on a new map, returning to your Routes wont work every time.

(05-08-2018, 08:29 PM)GHOSTK1LL3R Wrote:

(05-08-2018, 08:26 PM)Pollux Wrote: I think people really don't realise that FPS will not magically improve by switching maps to either V2D or pines, seriously there won't be much of a difference. V5P is so much more optimised than V4B1 and V33X, we were promised good FPS on it and look where that brought us. For those voting for V2D you're going to give us a super ugly map that still has bad frames. (you're only looking at 5-10more FPS) At least pines looks good and still should give us 5FPS more than what we currently have. It's just annoying that as soon as we switch you're going to get the other side going "omg I told you so frames suck" as no map is going to help deal with the FPS problems that lie within a gamemode .

Can you stop with this 'gamemode' constant argument. Did you even play V2D? If you did you'd have known it's the only map to give good FPS.

It will have good frames and were fully aware it's an ugly map. I'd prefer an ugly map than a dead server.

(05-08-2018, 07:28 PM)Shlomo Wrote:

(05-08-2018, 07:24 PM)Joe Joe Wrote:

(05-08-2018, 07:18 PM)perqe Wrote:

(05-08-2018, 07:07 PM)Joe Joe Wrote:

(05-08-2018, 06:56 PM)Dobbs Wrote: V2D has its cons, Pines has its cons. Other than you stating what role-plays you can do, which can happen on every V2D as well and the fact that pines looks better, is that it? You got to take in mind also that world houses also play a huge part in aggressive role-play, which V2D offers better than pines. V2D gives the best of both worlds, something Pines doesn't.

Actually; wrong. V2D always has and always will have priority towards the Aggressive Players. This map is different and gives everyone a level playing field. I want a City that actually looks like a City not every 10 buildings has a window if your lucky, and if your extra lucky you may have a working floor.

Its alright you wanting it, but think about whats best for the future.

and this is a question i want you to answer. On v2d do you not agree that the passive rp was amazing. It flowed they all connected. Both aggressive and passive were at their peak. The map and player base play a part in this. The old FL was much better than the new FL, bring back the old map old players come back and you could have a great FL again where there was a cue of 15 people to join the server.

Passive RP is peak on whatever map you play. However PassiveRP was muffled by Aggressive because you couldn't walk 5ft without the Doomfort Bridage at Slums strolling down Main Street eliminating any Government Official in the City. It was a City controlled by Criminals which isn't how it should be. There needs to be a balance. The Criminals do their business without attempting to continuously have domain over a populated City.

Lmao what there was always passiveRP on highstreet completely fine and safe from aggressiveRP.

(05-08-2018, 08:44 PM)Kevin Ramsey Wrote: As V2D has been added, due to the reason "sexy was not enough", why was it stated in the beginning that it would not be a choice due to downgrading and not work to our new updates and such?

People speaking against themselves which means that the statement of V2D is not strong enough.

With the V2D "sexy" showing a lot of downsides that outnumbers Pines heavily, why is it still an option? Are we sure that Fearless wants an unfinished map?

First, it was "sexy" and now original, lovely, wonder why tho?

(05-08-2018, 08:46 PM)JackZ Wrote:

(05-08-2018, 08:39 PM)Awestruck Wrote: The Original V2D has been added to the poll.

Right, to split the maps up even more so Pines 100% clearly wins.
Mint