(05-08-2018, 07:54 PM)[FL] Depression Wrote:

(05-08-2018, 07:43 PM)Chumps Wrote:
Thank you @Arny for the wonderful piece of work.

Just for 2 small things.
Wow
I now hope Pines wins, when it does, well it will be one empty map since most of the agressive players will leave, since no fun places to base, also the FPS. So I hope you enjoy roleplaying without a lot of players as well in a laggy server.

As said

(05-08-2018, 02:49 PM)GHOSTK1LL3R Wrote: This is the thing, aggressiveRP's every so often PassiveRP however PassiveRP'ers never AggRP.

You might as well just remove guns no point having them as there will be no-one else to shoot them.

(05-08-2018, 08:07 PM)GHOSTK1LL3R Wrote:

(05-08-2018, 08:00 PM)Falc Wrote: True Statment

Roleplay is what you make it. How do you expect people to roleplay when they're not only not gonna find you because the maps a hide and seek map and people are 10 FPS.

Yikes.

(05-08-2018, 08:10 PM)Yonno Wrote:

(05-08-2018, 08:03 PM)Falc Wrote: And I will add.

Why does it always have to be something new with everyone? Why is old so bad? A few dodgy textures yeah we get that, but it SUITS Fearless and most importantly ROLEPLAY and the players who make it what it is.

Sometimes taking a step backwards can move you 5 steps forward. Because I can put money down that if V2D returns, a shedload of players will return as well as PROPER Roleplay, not this bullshit you call Roleplay at the moment.

Feel free to respond to my comments, I probably won’t reply because I’m lazy. But I’ll read em.

I'm not on either side considering I voted V5P, but performance on V2D "sexy" is only slightly better compared to Pines when I was on the Applejack gamemode with 5 other players (around 55-60 FPS in the city). I can only imagine how awful it would be on either map with a full server.

If V2D ended up being chosen then we should most definitely use the original map, and hope that all additions to the game mode since then have not made performance much worse, either.

(05-08-2018, 08:12 PM)Chumps Wrote:

(05-08-2018, 07:54 PM)[FL] Depression Wrote:

(05-08-2018, 07:43 PM)Chumps Wrote:
Thank you @Arny for the wonderful piece of work.

Just for 2 small things.
Wow
I now hope Pines wins, when it does, well it will be one empty map since most of the agressive players will leave, since no fun places to base, also the FPS. So I hope you enjoy roleplaying without a lot of players as well in a laggy server.

As said

(05-08-2018, 02:49 PM)GHOSTK1LL3R Wrote: This is the thing, aggressiveRP's every so often PassiveRP however PassiveRP'ers never AggRP.

You might as well just remove guns no point having them as there will be no-one else to shoot them.

Sir, just leave already if you're gonna leave over a little map change that doesn't have "fun" places for your doomforts.

(05-08-2018, 08:17 PM)Joe Joe Wrote: FPS this, FPS that. Change your bell. After testing it, this map will have better than V5P which was bettering than V33X and V4B1. Yes V2D has the best FPS however Id rather have some lower frames than a map that is terribly constructed with many missing and incomplete areas. Some areas have work put in where some just look like they were thrown together when the creator was drunk.

I am sure these areas can be cleaned up with some world props. Bit peculiar that V2D lasted a phew years before someone thought that the design was made by someone "drunk".

And In response to "Born in 3x and made in V2D". Yes I was born in the past but want to play in the FUTURE, and V2D is not the future of FL. It got the chance to be the future many a time. However it failed. So stop taking steps backwards and move forward. Learn how to Aggressive and Passive on a new map, returning to your Routes wont work every time.

That first bit was a Royal Navy reference. And V2D is the future of FL. And no, it didn't fail, I'll ghostk1ll3r handle that case. And you may refer to it taking a step backwards, however FL needs to do this in order to go forwards. How many map changes have we had in this last year? V2D lasted the longest, making it the best in my opinion.

(05-08-2018, 08:17 PM)Joe Joe Wrote: FPS this, FPS that. Change your bell. After testing it, this map will have better than V5P which was bettering than V33X and V4B1. Yes V2D has the best FPS however Id rather have some lower frames than a map that is terribly constructed with many missing and incomplete areas. Some areas have work put in where some just look like they were thrown together when the creator was drunk.

And In response to "Born in 3x and made in V2D". Yes I was born in the past but want to play in the FUTURE, and V2D is not the future of FL. It got the chance to be the future many a time. However it failed. So stop taking steps backwards and move forward. Learn how to Aggressive and Passive on a new map, returning to your Routes wont work every time.

(05-08-2018, 08:23 PM)Yonno Wrote: Could we potentially ask for the original V2D to be added to the poll too?

I'm sure that alongside me, several others definitely prefer the original over this relatively poorly made "rework".

(05-08-2018, 08:23 PM)Falc Wrote:

(05-08-2018, 08:17 PM)Joe Joe Wrote: FPS this, FPS that. Change your bell. After testing it, this map will have better than V5P which was bettering than V33X and V4B1. Yes V2D has the best FPS however Id rather have some lower frames than a map that is terribly constructed with many missing and incomplete areas. Some areas have work put in where some just look like they were thrown together when the creator was drunk.

And In response to "Born in 3x and made in V2D". Yes I was born in the past but want to play in the FUTURE, and V2D is not the future of FL. It got the chance to be the future many a time. However it failed. So stop taking steps backwards and move forward. Learn how to Aggressive and Passive on a new map, returning to your Routes wont work every time.

Your response has said it all.

All you give a toss about is how to get the best experience for yourself, when in fact it’s time to put the community and other players first in the pecking order.

V2D can be the future based on standard gameplay. FPS is a huge say when deciding a map, because it decides whether one stays or goes.

Fearless is in a bad way, let’s not keep picking new maps to test and then end up not enjoying. Pick a map we know worked, we know was popular when it was on its own and more people here, a map that can be successful given the chance to be a solo server.