Fearless Forums
NEW MAP - Printable Version

+- Fearless Forums (https://fearlessrp.net)
+-- Forum: Community & Server Information (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Updates (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=178)
+---- Forum: Archive (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=341)
+---- Thread: NEW MAP (/showthread.php?tid=86682)



RE: NEW MAP - Yonno - 05-07-2018

I personally feel like both V2D "sexy" and Pines are shit compared to V4B1 and V5P.

After also having played both maps on applejack with around 60 fps (with an i7 4790k, GTX 980TI and 16GB of RAM) with 5 players I'm worried that FPS will not be much better on V2D sexy nor Pines compared to V5P.


RE: NEW MAP - Pollux - 05-07-2018

(05-07-2018, 07:20 PM)JackZ Wrote: Wait so according to the statistics, Pines will be even more laggy than v5p? Hoooollllyyyyyy

Where does it show that? I mean the FPS you will get on the map completely depends on how it was optimised. There is no way for us to find this out without decompiling it and finding out where the brushes are. We also have no idea how the gamemode will treat v2d_sexy and pines. For those who will say "We used to have V2D so we must know what the FPS is", the map had to have been decompiled for it to be edited. During this process, a lot of things including optimisation by the original creator can be lost. As such we do not know if the map editor re-optimised it well or not.


RE: NEW MAP - Pollux - 05-07-2018

(05-07-2018, 07:23 PM)Yonno Wrote: I personally feel like both V2D "sexy" and Pines are shit compared to V4B1 and V5P.

After also having played both maps on applejack with around 60 fps (with an i7 4790k, GTX 980TI and 16GB of RAM) with 5 players I'm worried that FPS will not be much better on V2D sexy nor Pines compared to V5P.

Honestly FPS shouldn't be too much of a factor between these two maps. Both maps will have poor FPS and that is fully down to the gamemode. Unless you guys want to play on flatgrass the map won't have much of an effect (most large maps are optimised well as they kinda have to)


RE: NEW MAP - Yonno - 05-07-2018

(05-07-2018, 07:30 PM)Pollux Wrote:
(05-07-2018, 07:23 PM)Yonno Wrote: I personally feel like both V2D "sexy" and Pines are shit compared to V4B1 and V5P.

After also having played both maps on applejack with around 60 fps (with an i7 4790k, GTX 980TI and 16GB of RAM) with 5 players I'm worried that FPS will not be much better on V2D sexy nor Pines compared to V5P.

Honestly FPS shouldn't be too much of a factor between these two maps. Both maps will have poor FPS and that is fully down to the gamemode. Unless you guys want to play on flatgrass the map won't have much of an effect (most large maps are optimised well as they kinda have to)

Yeah, I've stated this in my previous posts on this thread which got buried:

"I feel like this whole "V5P is shit" issue would never have been an issue if the gamemode was actually more optimized. I wholeheartedly agree with Nevy that V4B1 and V5P would be completely superior maps if we would be able to get better FPS. 

Why not attempt to tackle the elephant in the room and just attempt to provide us with better FPS by optimizing the gamemode, rather than doing this trial and error with a new map that has a clear split in votes, leaving almost 50% of the community unsatisfied with a map change."


RE: NEW MAP - don - 05-07-2018

(05-07-2018, 07:35 PM)Yonno Wrote:
(05-07-2018, 07:30 PM)Pollux Wrote:
(05-07-2018, 07:23 PM)Yonno Wrote: I personally feel like both V2D "sexy" and Pines are shit compared to V4B1 and V5P.

After also having played both maps on applejack with around 60 fps (with an i7 4790k, GTX 980TI and 16GB of RAM) with 5 players I'm worried that FPS will not be much better on V2D sexy nor Pines compared to V5P.

Honestly FPS shouldn't be too much of a factor between these two maps. Both maps will have poor FPS and that is fully down to the gamemode. Unless you guys want to play on flatgrass the map won't have much of an effect (most large maps are optimised well as they kinda have to)

Yeah, I've stated this in my previous posts on this thread which got buried:

"I feel like this whole "V5P is shit" issue would never have been an issue if the gamemode was actually more optimized. I wholeheartedly agree with Nevy that V4B1 and V5P would be completely superior maps if we would be able to get better FPS. 

Why not attempt to tackle the elephant in the room and just attempt to provide us with better FPS by optimizing the gamemode, rather than doing this trial and error with a new map that has a clear split in votes, leaving almost 50% of the community unsatisfied with a map change."

In my opinion its too big for what it has to offer. It looks spot on the map is is very good to look at but it just doesnt function like v2d.

In v2d you would have countless people chatting at bank, all the shops and stores and roleplays within the city almost linking together, like one could be a bar roleplay and you go there for a drink or whatever and then you could go to a different roleplay.

Everything just functioned and flowed on v2d for whatever reason. However, its hasnt on the current map.


RE: NEW MAP - Pollux - 05-07-2018

(05-07-2018, 07:42 PM)perqe Wrote:
(05-07-2018, 07:35 PM)Yonno Wrote:
(05-07-2018, 07:30 PM)Pollux Wrote:
(05-07-2018, 07:23 PM)Yonno Wrote: I personally feel like both V2D "sexy" and Pines are shit compared to V4B1 and V5P.

After also having played both maps on applejack with around 60 fps (with an i7 4790k, GTX 980TI and 16GB of RAM) with 5 players I'm worried that FPS will not be much better on V2D sexy nor Pines compared to V5P.

Honestly FPS shouldn't be too much of a factor between these two maps. Both maps will have poor FPS and that is fully down to the gamemode. Unless you guys want to play on flatgrass the map won't have much of an effect (most large maps are optimised well as they kinda have to)

Yeah, I've stated this in my previous posts on this thread which got buried:

"I feel like this whole "V5P is shit" issue would never have been an issue if the gamemode was actually more optimized. I wholeheartedly agree with Nevy that V4B1 and V5P would be completely superior maps if we would be able to get better FPS. 

Why not attempt to tackle the elephant in the room and just attempt to provide us with better FPS by optimizing the gamemode, rather than doing this trial and error with a new map that has a clear split in votes, leaving almost 50% of the community unsatisfied with a map change."

In my opinion its too big for what it has to offer. It looks spot on the map is is very good to look at but it just doesnt function like v2d.

In v2d you would have countless people chatting at bank, all the shops and stores and roleplays within the city almost linking together, like one could be a bar roleplay and you go there for a drink or whatever and then you could go to a different roleplay.

Everything just functioned and flowed on v2d for whatever reason. However, its hasnt on the current map.

I don't think this is due to the map, rather due to the playerbase.


RE: NEW MAP - Kevin - 05-07-2018

Got probably around 4/5 messages saying "Vote V2D sexy", hahaha proper marketing.

Hope for the best one, in the end, the one that makes the player base united.


RE: NEW MAP - don - 05-07-2018

(05-07-2018, 07:43 PM)Pollux Wrote:
(05-07-2018, 07:42 PM)perqe Wrote:
(05-07-2018, 07:35 PM)Yonno Wrote:
(05-07-2018, 07:30 PM)Pollux Wrote:
(05-07-2018, 07:23 PM)Yonno Wrote: I personally feel like both V2D "sexy" and Pines are shit compared to V4B1 and V5P.

After also having played both maps on applejack with around 60 fps (with an i7 4790k, GTX 980TI and 16GB of RAM) with 5 players I'm worried that FPS will not be much better on V2D sexy nor Pines compared to V5P.

Honestly FPS shouldn't be too much of a factor between these two maps. Both maps will have poor FPS and that is fully down to the gamemode. Unless you guys want to play on flatgrass the map won't have much of an effect (most large maps are optimised well as they kinda have to)

Yeah, I've stated this in my previous posts on this thread which got buried:

"I feel like this whole "V5P is shit" issue would never have been an issue if the gamemode was actually more optimized. I wholeheartedly agree with Nevy that V4B1 and V5P would be completely superior maps if we would be able to get better FPS. 

Why not attempt to tackle the elephant in the room and just attempt to provide us with better FPS by optimizing the gamemode, rather than doing this trial and error with a new map that has a clear split in votes, leaving almost 50% of the community unsatisfied with a map change."

In my opinion its too big for what it has to offer. It looks spot on the map is is very good to look at but it just doesnt function like v2d.

In v2d you would have countless people chatting at bank, all the shops and stores and roleplays within the city almost linking together, like one could be a bar roleplay and you go there for a drink or whatever and then you could go to a different roleplay.

Everything just functioned and flowed on v2d for whatever reason. However, its hasnt on the current map.

I don't think this is due to the map, rather due to the playerbase.

Both the map is one of the reasons why the playerbase is shit, so take what you want from that.


RE: NEW MAP - Foxirius2205 - 05-07-2018

(05-07-2018, 08:10 PM)Kevin Ramsey Wrote: Got probably around 4/5 messages saying "Vote V2D sexy", hahaha proper marketing.

Hope for the best one, in the end, the one that makes the player base united.

But did you vote for V2D sexy?


RE: NEW MAP - Generation - 05-07-2018

[Image: 29tmor.jpg]
Based on real situation when you get spammed to vote v2d