(08-24-2016, 04:16 PM)Divey Wrote: Why am I on there 4 times and Ghost is not on there? Obvious favoritism.

(08-24-2016, 04:17 PM)Agorith Wrote: I'm sorry but I say fuck off to that idea.

(08-24-2016, 04:20 PM)Immo Wrote: If you dont think our ideas work, admins, come up with some.

(08-24-2016, 04:14 PM)Greed^ Wrote:

(08-24-2016, 04:00 PM)Random Wrote:

(08-24-2016, 03:53 PM)Immo Wrote: To the thing about not enough people qualified:

Maybe promote some who are thought as candidates, give them some advice, teach them, and if you're too insecure, only let them moderatore  when they're with an SA / a mentor?
Ideas and possible solutions, not restrictions.

So you are suggesting some type of 'trial mod'? Could be a solution. But then theres the issue that SA aren't always (or often) avaible.

Restrict the tools they have access to and the SA wont have to watch them
For example: Phase 1: access to basic punishments - 1 day ban, 4 hour blacklist, access to noclip
phase 2: What we know as moderator now
Phase 3: Administrator

(08-24-2016, 04:11 PM)Create Wrote: Organisation is the key to success
[Image: lQ9b6wA.png]
Note: Not saying this is official or even if it would work, just an Idea

Although this would fix the problem, I don't agree with forcing the staff members, they should come on at their own free will

(08-24-2016, 04:22 PM)Random Wrote:

(08-24-2016, 04:20 PM)Immo Wrote: If you dont think our ideas work, admins, come up with some.

Maybe they are doing something "behind the scenes" that we don't know about..

(08-24-2016, 04:23 PM)Divey Wrote:

(08-24-2016, 04:14 PM)Greed^ Wrote:

(08-24-2016, 04:00 PM)Random Wrote:

(08-24-2016, 03:53 PM)Immo Wrote: To the thing about not enough people qualified:

Maybe promote some who are thought as candidates, give them some advice, teach them, and if you're too insecure, only let them moderatore  when they're with an SA / a mentor?
Ideas and possible solutions, not restrictions.

So you are suggesting some type of 'trial mod'? Could be a solution. But then theres the issue that SA aren't always (or often) avaible.

Restrict the tools they have access to and the SA wont have to watch them
For example: Phase 1: access to basic punishments - 1 day ban, 4 hour blacklist, access to noclip
phase 2: What we know as moderator now
Phase 3: Administrator

(08-24-2016, 04:11 PM)Create Wrote: Organisation is the key to success
[Image: lQ9b6wA.png]
Note: Not saying this is official or even if it would work, just an Idea

Although this would fix the problem, I don't agree with forcing the staff members, they should come on at their own free will

The trial-mod thing I do not agree with, the suggestion you have provided is basically exactly the same to what mods have now.

(08-24-2016, 04:24 PM)Immo Wrote:

(08-24-2016, 04:22 PM)Random Wrote:

(08-24-2016, 04:20 PM)Immo Wrote: If you dont think our ideas work, admins, come up with some.

Maybe they are doing something "behind the scenes" that we don't know about..

Based on this thread, I think its time to let us know.

(08-24-2016, 04:27 PM)Greed^ Wrote:

(08-24-2016, 04:23 PM)Divey Wrote:

(08-24-2016, 04:14 PM)Greed^ Wrote:

(08-24-2016, 04:00 PM)Random Wrote:

(08-24-2016, 03:53 PM)Immo Wrote: To the thing about not enough people qualified:

Maybe promote some who are thought as candidates, give them some advice, teach them, and if you're too insecure, only let them moderatore  when they're with an SA / a mentor?
Ideas and possible solutions, not restrictions.

So you are suggesting some type of 'trial mod'? Could be a solution. But then theres the issue that SA aren't always (or often) avaible.

Restrict the tools they have access to and the SA wont have to watch them
For example: Phase 1: access to basic punishments - 1 day ban, 4 hour blacklist, access to noclip
phase 2: What we know as moderator now
Phase 3: Administrator

(08-24-2016, 04:11 PM)Create Wrote: Organisation is the key to success
[Image: lQ9b6wA.png]
Note: Not saying this is official or even if it would work, just an Idea

Although this would fix the problem, I don't agree with forcing the staff members, they should come on at their own free will

The trial-mod thing I do not agree with, the suggestion you have provided is basically exactly the same to what mods have now.

In what way?
I am suggesting that player who the staff team can't guarantee will do a good job as moderator goes into phase 1, where he/she is limited on tools that can be abused, and basically gets tested out. If they do a good job, they proceed to phase 2 which is what mods have now, so how is that the same?

(08-24-2016, 03:47 PM)Random Wrote:

(08-24-2016, 03:42 PM)Greed^ Wrote:

(08-24-2016, 03:38 PM)Random Wrote: Y'all only think about the actual demotion itself, not anything past that..

So they demote everyone inactive*?What then? There may not be anyone qualified to take the spot as a mod (or higher) at this moment of time..

Give this a moment, it will probably all play out OK.

Edit: Edited a bit where the * is.

I can point out loads of people who "qualify", and even though they don't fit into what the staff team considers the perfect candidate, I am sure there's loads of people who would do a better job as a moderator than a lot of the current team does

What you think and what the staff team thinks is something completley diffrent though..

There's clearly some sort of issue demoting the inactive ones, or else it would've been done. Don't ya think?