(10-07-2015, 03:14 PM)KGHOSTK1LL3R Wrote:

(10-07-2015, 07:08 AM)NightHawkd Wrote: We will not make any decisions until we hear from Ghost. So unless you yourself have a video proving that you are innocent and it was merely only crossfire then please do post it and this can all end but as it stands right now there isn't sufficient evidence to deny this ban request.

I only have a few screenshots(posted the ones that were relevant). There is zero point in me publishing the full unedited versions as I only cropped out the full thing so I can show you what we're looking at.

Also, you state this : 'stands right now there isn't sufficient evidence to deny this ban request.'. Explain to me how yourself and Grub have decided that there is ins't evidence to prove his innocence. The facts stand that they were near a gun fight and they got hit 3 times. They have no proof Awestruck aimed at them specifically or it was intentional. 

This is why Ivan closed this case because there was no evidence to prove Awestruck hit him on purpose. This is also why Audacter didn't ban Awestruck in game also.

'3. Evidence is a requirement, do not request log checks, include solid evidence for your report or do not post one. '

This is a rule of the ban request forums. Rims nor Budy have provided any solid evidence that Awestruck intentionally shot Rims.  The only evidence is the logs which show the damage but you cannot prove that it wasn't crossfire. 

I am requesting Tempski and Audacter to comment on why they didn't ban Awestruck because NIghthawk and you Grub are both looking for a reason to ban Awestruck and you have made that perfectly clear.
' right now there isn't sufficient evidence to deny this ban request.'
'Alright. Well Ivan you may not like me here but well I'm here to do things right'

Also, as I said before. The photos of the gas masked person are me and my firing position. Some people were on the flat ground and some people were elevated. It might look like in my screenshots that I had a downward angle does not mean Awestruck did because I told everyone to spread out and Awestruck decided to be on the ground.

Again, I am requesting Tempski and Audacter to re-comment on why they didn't ban Awestruck. 


Also, Grub you state 'hard punishment will be taken' etc...But you allow Budy to present a photo he made which made it look like there was no SRU around him. this directly violates this rule:

'5.  Fabricating or tampering with evidence with intent to mislead, and providing false statements is under zero tolerance - committing such violations will lead to a perm ban.'

I am also requesting that Grub and NightHawk do not decide what happens in this thread. They both have a personal venteta against Awestruck which is quite obvious from these quotes: 

 'right now there isn't sufficient evidence to deny this ban request.'
'Alright. Well Ivan you may not like me here but well I'm here to do things right'

This I only assume has been due to this thread that Awestruck posted on NightHawk(notice who denied the admin abuse):
http://www.fearlessrp.net/showthread.php?tid=64900

(10-07-2015, 03:22 PM)Zerdrick Wrote:

(10-07-2015, 03:14 PM)KGHOSTK1LL3R Wrote:

(10-07-2015, 07:08 AM)NightHawkd Wrote: -snip-

-snip-

(10-07-2015, 03:44 PM)Audacter Wrote:

(10-07-2015, 03:22 PM)Zerdrick Wrote:

(10-07-2015, 03:14 PM)KGHOSTK1LL3R Wrote:

(10-07-2015, 07:08 AM)NightHawkd Wrote: -snip-

-snip-

User issued with a one point warning. If you're not involved please refrain from posting.

(10-07-2015, 04:16 PM)Audacter Wrote: The reason I suggested posting a Player Report was due to the fact that I personally couldn't prove anything at that point, as I wasn't there so I couldn't see the spacings and firing lines. I suggested this because you (Ghost) said you had everything on recording, thus saying you could argue Awestuck's innocence.

(10-07-2015, 04:35 PM)_AwestruckBullet_ Wrote: Before any judgements are made. I suggest you review this case:

http://www.fearlessrp.net/showthread.php?tid=65103

This just proves Rims' and Budy's lack of credibility within this case.

(10-07-2015, 04:44 PM)_AwestruckBullet_ Wrote: Do you have evidence to support these claims? No. I didn't think so.

(10-07-2015, 04:47 PM)Rims Wrote:

(10-07-2015, 04:44 PM)_AwestruckBullet_ Wrote: Do you have evidence to support these claims? No. I didn't think so.

roflmao this is like a 10/10 thread dude. You've been asked by an admin and a Super-Admin to supply evidence to prove your story, and yet you and your mouth piece have masterfully and blatantly been ignoring it for over 24 hours. You somehow decided that the best course of action is to desperately post a separate BR on your accusers. This is like a parody.