Fearless Forums
New rule - Tranq spam - Printable Version

+- Fearless Forums (https://fearlessrp.net)
+-- Forum: CityRP Server (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: Suggestions (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+---- Forum: Finished (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=26)
+---- Thread: New rule - Tranq spam (/showthread.php?tid=58961)

Pages: 1 2


New rule - Tranq spam - James_Gaff - 03-24-2015

[Image: ban.png]
Title of Suggestion:
No tranquiliser spam

Description:
Make a rule regarding people tranquiliser spamming, and it not being allowed.

Why:
After an unfortunate set of circumstances while on v33x I was involved in a situation where I was part of the raiding force, and 2 users of the opposite force chose to spam tranq the raiding force, making it not only impossible to raid or do anything, but causing a number of innocents to become hostaged, though they had nothing to do with the situation. I believe making a rule against spam shooting someone with a tranquiliser gun would be beneficial to stop things like this, as it wasted near 15 minutes of my just laying on the ground. As well as this, spam tranquing is rather failRP as in real life you don't get police raiding a compound and them being constantly knocked out by two blocked with sleeper darts.

TL;DR: minges spam knocked us out. 



RE: New rule - Tranq spam - SixPackSoCali - 03-24-2015

+Support


RE: New rule - Tranq spam - Stitch - 03-24-2015

+Support


RE: New rule - Tranq spam - BlackDog - 03-24-2015

So your suggestion is to force people not to use a tranq in rapid succession during a raid?


RE: New rule - Tranq spam - Baskingner - 03-24-2015

What rule would you be suggesting? I cant imagine a good, solid easily enforcable rule without restricting the tranqer too much.

-Support


RE: New rule - Tranq spam - James_Gaff - 03-24-2015

My suggestion is to simply make it against the rules to spam tranquilise someone. A lot like spam tazing someone is somewhat failRP


RE: New rule - Tranq spam - Temar - 03-24-2015

- support
What is needed is more of a defense, eg to help prevent mass use in raid deference, eg a drug not a rule


RE: New rule - Tranq spam - Edned - 03-24-2015

- Support.
Nice idea but I don't see this having a positive affect.


RE: New rule - Tranq spam - Chumps - 03-25-2015

(03-24-2015, 09:57 PM)Temar Wrote: - support
What is needed is more of a defense, eg to help prevent mass use in raid deference, eg a drug not a rule



RE: New rule - Tranq spam - equal - 03-25-2015

(03-24-2015, 09:57 PM)Temar Wrote: - support
What is needed is more of a defense, eg to help prevent mass use in raid deference, eg a drug not a rule

Do you expect the players to make that drug?