+- Fearless Forums (https://fearlessrp.net)
+-- Forum: The Courthouse (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=13)
+--- Forum: Unban Request (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=15)
+---- Forum: Denied (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=32)
+---- Thread: Misunderstanding -Case escalated for SA review. (/showthread.php?tid=37712)
RE: Misunderstanding - EODxChaos - 09-22-2013
(09-22-2013, 07:38 PM)GHOSTK1LL3R Wrote: The president authorized me (Before this happened) to use "danger close" which means shoot close to him, but not hit him. And as shown by the videos proves this.
I can confirm I gave him orders to use danger close.
RE: Misunderstanding - D0ctor - 09-22-2013
Danger close does not make sense.
In close air support, artillery, mortar, and naval gunfire support fires, it is the term included in the method of engagement segment of a call for fire which indicates that friendly forces are within close proximity of the target. is the definition.
RE: Misunderstanding - User 12049 - 09-22-2013
We were trying to make the situation as realistic as possible. Stop trying to pick the fine details.
RE: Misunderstanding - User 12049 - 09-23-2013
Looking back at the report. I was banned for MASS RDM. And as you have shown no proof of this and have only been able to pin me down on killing someone who is tranqed, I feel this ban should be changed to a breakage of FearRP.
RE: Misunderstanding -Case escalated for SA review. - User 12049 - 09-25-2013
Why is this 'SA review' taking so long... When you say the Maximum hold is 5 days, does that mean you are going to wait until the 5th day to do this?
(09-22-2013, 07:34 PM)Narcotic Wrote: I never stated you intended to kill him, I stated your direction of shooting clearly puts him in a risk and he was in a risk.
Case escalated for SA review. Maximum hold time 5 days.
RE: Misunderstanding -Case escalated for SA review. - Narc - 09-25-2013
(09-25-2013, 03:09 PM)GHOSTK1LL3R Wrote: Why is this 'SA review' taking so long... When you say the Maximum hold is 5 days, does that mean you are going to wait until the 5th day to do this?
(09-22-2013, 07:34 PM)Narcotic Wrote: I never stated you intended to kill him, I stated your direction of shooting clearly puts him in a risk and he was in a risk.
Case escalated for SA review. Maximum hold time 5 days.
Escalation note has been issued.
RE: Misunderstanding -Case escalated for SA review. - User 12049 - 09-25-2013
Thank you
(09-25-2013, 03:25 PM)Narcotic Wrote:(09-25-2013, 03:09 PM)GHOSTK1LL3R Wrote: Why is this 'SA review' taking so long... When you say the Maximum hold is 5 days, does that mean you are going to wait until the 5th day to do this?
(09-22-2013, 07:34 PM)Narcotic Wrote: I never stated you intended to kill him, I stated your direction of shooting clearly puts him in a risk and he was in a risk.
Case escalated for SA review. Maximum hold time 5 days.
Escalation note has been issued.
RE: Misunderstanding -Case escalated for SA review. - Killjoy - 09-25-2013
Escalation received and reviewed.
Appeal denied, user has not presented sufficient evidence to disprove this ban.
Also, for clarificaton: 'danger close' shooting is pretty much just as bad as KOS. Stuff like this in real life is only taken to use in the event of martial law.
PS: If the turn-around time is 5 days, that means you will be replied to within 5 days, which might as well be on the 5th day itself. Bumping and complaining will not speed things up - on the contrary, every time somebody tries to pressure me to work their case faster, I drop it to the bottom of my to-do list.