![]() |
2nd Amendment - Printable Version +- Fearless Forums (https://fearlessrp.net) +-- Forum: General Discussion (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=10) +--- Forum: Discussions (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +---- Forum: Archive (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=481) +---- Thread: 2nd Amendment (/showthread.php?tid=16677) |
RE: 2nd Amendment - Slick Rick - 08-06-2012 (08-06-2012, 04:00 PM)Dylan Wrote:(08-06-2012, 03:56 PM)Slick Rick Wrote:(08-06-2012, 03:55 PM)Dylan Wrote:(08-06-2012, 03:53 PM)Slick Rick Wrote: You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass. - Isoroku Yamamoto, Fleet Admiral and Commander-in-Chief of the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) during World War II "Smallest part of the mainland"? Hawaii (where Pearl Harbor was) and Alaska are not mainland. The Japanese would have never invaded the mainland of the USA. And yes, they did do something, considering they never invaded. RE: 2nd Amendment - Dylan - 08-06-2012 (08-06-2012, 04:02 PM)Slick Rick Wrote: "Smallest part of the mainland"? Hawaii (where Pearl Harbor was) and Alaska are not mainland. Uh, I never said that Pearl Harbor was part of the mainland, in fact I said that if Japan had total control of the Pacific Ocean you are 100% sure it would not dare entering America's mainland? Not just a teeny tiny bit? RE: 2nd Amendment - Slick Rick - 08-06-2012 (08-06-2012, 04:04 PM)Dylan Wrote:Well Japan alone, hell no. With allies? Not 100%.(08-06-2012, 04:02 PM)Slick Rick Wrote: "Smallest part of the mainland"? Hawaii (where Pearl Harbor was) and Alaska are not mainland. RE: 2nd Amendment - Faustie - 08-06-2012 We're straying a bit here, but the first point was that being able to own extremely dangerous weapons in vast quantities should not be allowed just because of the 'government tyranny' excuse. For one, it's illogical, the army is both always better trained and better armed than you, so it makes no sense. Also, the US won't go totalitarian, as Dylan said there are a ton of much more effective, much more serious methods in place, such as the UN and Nato, which don't also carry the risk of letting stupid civilians own high-powered weaponry they shouldn't. RE: 2nd Amendment - Joey Skylynx - 08-06-2012 Would like to point this out... Japan did attack American soil. The campaign was called 'The Aleutian Islands Campaign' (08-06-2012, 09:12 PM)Faustie Wrote: We're straying a bit here, but the first point was that being able to own extremely dangerous weapons in vast quantities should not be allowed just because of the 'government tyranny' excuse. For one, it's illogical, the army is both always better trained and better armed than you, so it makes no sense. Also, the US won't go totalitarian, as Dylan said there are a ton of much more effective, much more serious methods in place, such as the UN and Nato, which don't also carry the risk of letting stupid civilians own high-powered weaponry they shouldn't.Why do you assume the military isn't civilians in it's own right...? RE: 2nd Amendment - Slick Rick - 08-06-2012 (08-06-2012, 09:56 PM)Joey Skylynx Wrote: Would like to point this out... Yeah the discussion was about the mainland though. We know Japan has attacked American soil. Edit: and 'The Aleutian Islands Campaign' was in Alaska RE: 2nd Amendment - Dylan - 08-07-2012 (08-06-2012, 09:56 PM)Joey Skylynx Wrote: Why do you assume the military isn't civilians in it's own right...? ci·vil·ian noun /səˈvilyən/ civilians, plural A person not in the armed services or the police force RE: 2nd Amendment - StillAlive - 12-15-2012 Here we go with yet another school shooting. This has no end. Screw that damn law and get something done. It's for your own good. RE: 2nd Amendment - HellShell - 12-15-2012 The last post was 4 months ago ![]() RE: 2nd Amendment - StillAlive - 12-15-2012 And I'm the author of the thread. It hasn't been locked and it's a discussion. Would you rather that I made a new thread? That would be silly. Now do me a favor and stay ontopic. |