+- Fearless Forums (https://fearlessrp.net)
+-- Forum: General Discussion (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=10)
+--- Forum: Off-Topic (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+---- Forum: Archive (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=41)
+---- Thread: Suarez For Demotion (/showthread.php?tid=63244)
RE: Suarez For Demotion - ||Fangz|| - 08-03-2015
( ͡°( ͡° ͜ʖ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)ʖ ͡°) ͡°)
RE: Suarez For Demotion - Cate - 08-03-2015
(08-03-2015, 10:39 AM)Rain Wrote: How about you don't post a "demotion" thread in off topic and then I might take it seriously
Instead of posting with a clear attitude and a "I'm going to wrap this up instantly" demeanor, perhaps you could justify Suarez's attempt at silencing the criticism.
RE: Suarez For Demotion - Suarez - 08-03-2015
(08-03-2015, 10:20 AM)Waterloo Wrote: Wait, so let me get this straight. You just warned a guy for +supporting my thread. Which was based on free speech. Since when am I not allowed to express my feelings on a promotion I deem invalid.
Any warning you try to issue me will result in a admin abuse pursuit.
Warned for arguing with players/veterans and myself about his Forum Warnings.
RE: Suarez For Demotion - DVN - 08-03-2015
You'd post it in a Staff Report, due to the fact you've tried to provide evidence and recall previous accounts of abuse in the past. Although it's still not going to have any effect so don't bother.
RE: Suarez For Demotion - Waterloo - 08-03-2015
(08-03-2015, 10:47 AM)DVN Wrote: You'd post it in a Staff Report, due to the fact you've tried to provide evidence and recall previous accounts of abuse in the past. Although it's still not going to have any effect so don't bother.
Which is why I put it in off topic. But now I have solid evidence.
RE: Suarez For Demotion - Nexus - 08-03-2015
This thread probably won't get him demoted anyways, so it's kinda pointless imo.
RE: Suarez For Demotion - DVN - 08-03-2015
(08-03-2015, 10:48 AM)Waterloo Wrote:(08-03-2015, 10:47 AM)DVN Wrote: You'd post it in a Staff Report, due to the fact you've tried to provide evidence and recall previous accounts of abuse in the past. Although it's still not going to have any effect so don't bother.
Which is why I put it in off topic. But now I have solid evidence.
Solid evidence of what? You have no evidence to have him demoted, if you do stop posting here and make an abuse report.
RE: Suarez For Demotion - Waterloo - 08-03-2015
(08-03-2015, 10:49 AM)Nexus Wrote: This thread probably won't get him demoted anyways, so it's kinda pointless imo.
Guess we'll just have to see where the admin abuse thread I'm making will get him to.
RE: Suarez For Demotion - Cate - 08-03-2015
(08-03-2015, 10:52 AM)DVN Wrote:Solid evidence of him silencing criticism. If you seriously support him on that then I assume you also support Stalin, Lenin, Mugabe, Pol Pot and Kim Jong Un.(08-03-2015, 10:48 AM)Waterloo Wrote:(08-03-2015, 10:47 AM)DVN Wrote: You'd post it in a Staff Report, due to the fact you've tried to provide evidence and recall previous accounts of abuse in the past. Although it's still not going to have any effect so don't bother.
Which is why I put it in off topic. But now I have solid evidence.
Solid evidence of what? You have no evidence to have him demoted, if you do stop posting here and make an abuse report.
RE: Suarez For Demotion - Von Tempski - 08-03-2015
This needed closing a long time ago. Suarez is a legit guy, yeah his promotion was rushed but it needed to be. I think he'll make a great staff member despite the circumstances.