Fearless Forums
Unban request - [FL:RP] _^Casanova# - Printable Version

+- Fearless Forums (https://fearlessrp.net)
+-- Forum: The Courthouse (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=13)
+--- Forum: Unban Request (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=15)
+---- Forum: Approved (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=31)
+---- Thread: Unban request - [FL:RP] _^Casanova# (/showthread.php?tid=30357)

Pages: 1 2 3


RE: Unban request - [FL:RP] _^Casanova# - Joykill - 04-19-2013

(04-19-2013, 06:36 PM)Fultzy Wrote: Alright. I didnt put it was FailRP anyway I said it could be considered for that reason.

It is prop climbing. And that is still what it is.

Then why do you state, that when it's irrelevant in addition to OP's unban request?


RE: Unban request - [FL:RP] _^Casanova# - equal - 04-19-2013

I would also like you to point out the walkways.

All walls are 1x4, the rest shoulnd't be considered a wall as it is just supports for the roof. Besides that all walls are 1x4.

[Image: FE2AA9BC0A23FD5651551FF656E8C18BAF02A888]

[Image: 021FA4FF2B7FDB0504DC4D90B73C26F4BF1D03FE]

[Image: 9AAE4310EF4FD218D22CF2FC28EA23BA4034BC35]

[Image: 5B24E0E9F78783DF84723C0BFAAFCBF71A53AE9D]

Also, you are forgetting the fact that. - Vauld approved the base.


RE: Unban request - [FL:RP] _^Casanova# - Fultz - 04-19-2013

[Image: 021FA4FF2B7FDB0504DC4D90B73C26F4BF1D03FE]

That is 6.

That is also a nonsupported walkway on the side. They were using it to get ontop of the fence running back and forth.


RE: Unban request - [FL:RP] _^Casanova# - equal - 04-19-2013

It's not only supported by the fence, but also by the entire structure. It is used to get to the window, not to the fence. That they might have used it to get unto the fence doesn't make it a walkway.


RE: Unban request - [FL:RP] _^Casanova# - Fultz - 04-19-2013

I will not consider it a legal base (because it isnt) but if Vauld comes onto this unban and said he approved it I will remove that section of the ban. But this dupe is over the wall limit.

The propclimbs will stay on each due to the fact they used the walkway to get unto the fence.

Edit: Also I would like to speak to Mathias and Casanova on that part of the ban. You are not involved in the propclimbing Equal so you are done on this unban.


RE: Unban request - [FL:RP] _^Casanova# - equal - 04-19-2013

Yes, I am done thank you.

But the reason I constructed this base the way I did was because I got the idea from [FL] Lt. Grub because he's got a base that is infact almost identical, wall wise.

Anyways, I'm done yes.


RE: Unban request - [FL:RP] _^Casanova# - Vauld - 04-19-2013

I did approve the walkway, it seemed fine to me, but I also told you all that it's only okay if they have the same height advantage as you, and that they should be able to shoot at you. The wall size, I wasn't aware it was over the limit or I would of said something.


RE: Unban request - [FL:RP] _^Casanova# - equal - 04-20-2013

They have exactly the same height advantage as we do, that's what I just told you guys.

It continues to be 1x4 for both parties as you walk up the ramp. They are also able to shoot us as much as we are able to shoot them.
And if you're concerned wether or not it is raidable you can ask Shadow as he raided us himself without trouble.


RE: Unban request - [FL:RP] _^Casanova# - Nevy - 04-20-2013

- Just felt like throwing the difference out there

Warned


RE: Unban request - [FL:RP] _^Casanova# - DoomDude1 - 04-20-2013

Fence ~ wall.

Use common sense.