+- Fearless Forums (https://fearlessrp.net)
+-- Forum: General Discussion (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=10)
+--- Forum: Discussions (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+---- Forum: Archive (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=481)
+---- Thread: V2D (/showthread.php?tid=91952)
RE: V2D - Lewwings - 03-02-2019
Lol, players aren’t banned for being an “AggressiveRPer”, but for breaking the rules/ToS. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
RE: V2D - Internet Explorer - 03-02-2019
(03-02-2019, 08:51 PM)Lewwings Wrote: Lol, players aren’t banned for being an “AggressiveRPer”, but for breaking the rules/ToS. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Lol, next time read the full reply before responding, what i wrote was that in a sense aggressive RP players were banned because you can't have aggressive RP on a map that forces you to have 15 FPS inside the city, ROFL ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
RE: V2D - Awestruck - 03-02-2019
(03-02-2019, 09:12 PM)Internet Explorer Wrote:(03-02-2019, 08:51 PM)Lewwings Wrote: Lol, players aren’t banned for being an “AggressiveRPer”, but for breaking the rules/ToS. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Lol, next time read the full reply before responding, what i wrote was that in a sense aggressive RP players were banned because you can't have aggressive RP on a map that forces you to have 15 FPS inside the city, ROFL ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Your statement makes no sense. You're basically saying that Agg. RPers get banned because they can't Roleplay their style because of FPS? I'm confused.
RE: V2D - Lewwings - 03-02-2019
(03-02-2019, 09:12 PM)Internet Explorer Wrote:(03-02-2019, 08:51 PM)Lewwings Wrote: Lol, players aren’t banned for being an “AggressiveRPer”, but for breaking the rules/ToS. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Lol, next time read the full reply before responding, what i wrote was that in a sense aggressive RP players were banned because you can't have aggressive RP on a map that forces you to have 15 FPS inside the city, ROFL ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
However, how on Earth is V2D in anyway a map that balances both roleplay sides? Oh wait, it doesn't. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
RE: V2D - JoshZ - 03-02-2019
(03-02-2019, 09:29 PM)Lewwings Wrote:(03-02-2019, 09:12 PM)Internet Explorer Wrote:(03-02-2019, 08:51 PM)Lewwings Wrote: Lol, players aren’t banned for being an “AggressiveRPer”, but for breaking the rules/ToS. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Lol, next time read the full reply before responding, what i wrote was that in a sense aggressive RP players were banned because you can't have aggressive RP on a map that forces you to have 15 FPS inside the city, ROFL ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
However, how on Earth is V2D in anyway a map that balances both roleplay sides? Oh wait, it doesn't. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
How on earth does V4B1 balance both aggresive and passive?
RE: V2D - Internet Explorer - 03-02-2019
(03-02-2019, 09:28 PM)Awestruck Wrote:(03-02-2019, 09:12 PM)Internet Explorer Wrote:(03-02-2019, 08:51 PM)Lewwings Wrote: Lol, players aren’t banned for being an “AggressiveRPer”, but for breaking the rules/ToS. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Lol, next time read the full reply before responding, what i wrote was that in a sense aggressive RP players were banned because you can't have aggressive RP on a map that forces you to have 15 FPS inside the city, ROFL ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Your statement makes no sense. You're basically saying that Agg. RPers get banned because they can't Roleplay their style because of FPS? I'm confused.
Here we can see Awestruck and Lewwings stating that FPS doesent affect aggressive roleplay, i wont even try to debunk something so stupid ill leave that for the silent reader.
RE: V2D - Lewwings - 03-02-2019
V4B1 is a better map as it allows "breathing space" and isn't cramped that roleplays are forced to overlay with each other, not to mention V4B1 doesn't look like a child's Lego set, or the fact that it's so broken as a map (cave of crashing). Meanwhile, V4B1 offers a large space to roleplay as while as allowing for mini-events/events to be hosted on the map, without affecting anyone who doesn't want to be involved.
Also, I never stated anything about FPS, so don't bend my words. However; I can say I certainly get better FPS on V4B1 than V2D, that's just my experience in general.
RE: V2D - Internet Explorer - 03-02-2019
(03-02-2019, 09:29 PM)Lewwings Wrote:(03-02-2019, 09:12 PM)Internet Explorer Wrote:(03-02-2019, 08:51 PM)Lewwings Wrote: Lol, players aren’t banned for being an “AggressiveRPer”, but for breaking the rules/ToS. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Lol, next time read the full reply before responding, what i wrote was that in a sense aggressive RP players were banned because you can't have aggressive RP on a map that forces you to have 15 FPS inside the city, ROFL ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
However, how on Earth is V2D in anyway a map that balances both roleplay sides? Oh wait, it doesn't. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I got my share of RPP on Fearless and "others" by doing passive RP's on V2D so i dont see why V2D and passives RP's are incompatible.
RE: V2D - Lewwings - 03-02-2019
(03-02-2019, 09:45 PM)Internet Explorer Wrote:(03-02-2019, 09:29 PM)Lewwings Wrote:(03-02-2019, 09:12 PM)Internet Explorer Wrote:(03-02-2019, 08:51 PM)Lewwings Wrote: Lol, players aren’t banned for being an “AggressiveRPer”, but for breaking the rules/ToS. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Lol, next time read the full reply before responding, what i wrote was that in a sense aggressive RP players were banned because you can't have aggressive RP on a map that forces you to have 15 FPS inside the city, ROFL ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
However, how on Earth is V2D in anyway a map that balances both roleplay sides? Oh wait, it doesn't. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I got my share of RPP on Fearless and "others" by doing passive RP's on V2D so i dont see why V2D and passives RP's are incompatible.
Good for you, however, if you played on V2D last time it was up (when it was the main server; June-Aug 2018), many good areas and a fair chunk of the inner city were over-run with AggressiveRP, I cannot count how many times I would be shot amongst the gunfire, only a short space away from PassiveRP, as well as many areas that would be good for PassiveRP basically being cordoned off by the AggRP, which made potential passive player interactions in those areas suffer.
RE: V2D - Internet Explorer - 03-02-2019
(03-02-2019, 09:45 PM)Lewwings Wrote: V4B1 is a better map as it allows "breathing space" and isn't cramped that roleplays are forced to overlay with each other, not to mention V4B1 doesn't look like a child's Lego set, or the fact that it's so broken as a map (cave of crashing). Meanwhile, V4B1 offers a large space to roleplay as while as allowing for mini-events/events to be hosted on the map, without affecting anyone who doesn't want to be involved.
Also, I never stated anything about FPS, so don't bend my words. However; I can say I certainly get better FPS on V4B1 than V2D, that's just my experience in general.
"I can say I certainly get better FPS on V4B1 than V2D, that's just my experience in general." what a big fat lie every single person in this forum knows you're lying through your teeth, i used to play Fearless on my old ass laptop and managed to get a stable 30 fps, if i join now on my gaming desktop ill get 15fps on a good day.
The only way i can see what you said being true is if your comparing the server when it had v2d and constant 75 players with 20 in queue to join and the current state of the server with 10 players during the week
"V4B1 is a better map as it allows "breathing space" and isn't cramped that roleplays are forced" yeah and everybody knows that you realy need breathing space from all the other 7 players on the server i bet if someone with claustrophobia join the game things wouldn't go so well