Estleback Corporation

[Link]

Greetings,

I am afraid you are trying to blame us for a crime we did not commit. At the time, Mr Wong was working for you as an actor. This means the Estleback Corporation is in no way shape or form affiliated or liable for his actions or opinions off duty. Because he was working for you at that moment in time, you take responsibility for his actions. All of our agents on the night were wearing dark suits and standing in their pre-allocated positions, and he was granted permission to switch duties to satisfy both of his allegiances, which proves he was not acting on behalf us at this moment. Also, we had an operative backstage making sure only the people who were meant to be on stage were; he wouldn't have let him on if he wasn't supposed to be there.

 If anything, this reinforces the idea that you have a disregard for ethics, as this was obviously planned; he was just playing a role given to him by you and your team, and for the sake of his job and devotion, he had to comply. Moreover, how was he to know it wasn't a prop and full of caps? - he fired only one shot which confirms he was unaware. On top of this, his bodily movements before firing connote he didn't expect recoil, which furthers my case. This whole problem is likely to be a mix up from an incompetent member of your staff team in the theatrics and display department, who can't tell a real from a fake... a lot like you and your news, I suppose. The death could also have been planned by you or your events organisers, as another way to kill someone off for 'comedy effect'.

There are also multiple reasons why we did not bring this up to you when it happened, clearing us of this apparent hypocrisy you talk about. Firstly, all of the senior members of the governance at the time (Myself and Anthony Valaris) were stationed at the front of the building, where the security risk was highest. We have trained our agents in obedience, and wouldn't expect them to go running to you to complain about this without authorisation, and the Estleback governance was not notified that a problem like this had arisen. If we had seen this happen first hand, rest assured the events that unfolded after Saturday's debate would've happened sooner.

Secondly, even watching the dreadful display on repeat, It still looks like it could've been staged.  Not only were you in a boxing ring, which has padded floors (so if the actor failed the stunt I am about to talk about, it would still look genuine and theatrical), but the positioning of the actors is a motif of a classic magic show. If the shotgun was full of caps as hopefully intended, the actor would fall through onto a mat that was hidden behind the Miss Evocity crown pedestal and lay there until the curtains went down, to look like she had perished. She would then leave through to the backstage area during the scene transition. The agent we had on duty watching the performance, and members of the public, may have thought that the whole ordeal was special effects and was an illusion. To prove this idea, the shotgun was being pointed in the air, and not directly at the person in question. How on earth were real bullets supposed to hit her? This again points to the death being staged. I would like a death certificate to prove that she was killed.

In the Great Debate, not only did I witness a murder first hand, but it also went without question; it was crystal clear, and there is no arguing what happened.

I find it odd that you have waited this long to bring this up, as I would've thought it would've been in your interest to report on people you believe were committing unethical actions; for the ratings, of course. On top of this, if you believed us to have committed these unethical actions, why did you continue to partner with us after this occurrence, and why did you not get rid of us for apparently failing to keep your act safe? Stop trying to brush the truth under the carpet and answer up.

Kind regards,

[Image: QOIkS0y.png]

Deputy Director of the Estleback Corporation