Miku

[Aly]

Reported User(s): Miku

Reported User's SteamID: STEAM_0:1:45193316

Date & Time (GMT): 7/7/22 @ 10 GMT

Summary of the incident
i was out patrolling and heading to the place from a investigation when i got a message and i ran on my feet to the place. but only made it so far as you see on the first picture. 2min she gave me to make it.

after that this happened i found out it was Uex car and that they asked a friend to become police to simply remove it and change job away from police.


and to make matter's worst she then continue to run around without her Security with her i got multiple shot's of that both at the first incident and others 


and to add damage to injuries she then demote me after i am asking her if she is corrupt or dictator. she then reveal her hand by demoting me again added in my opinion that she is missing that corruption in her description or just renaming her something along the line's as The Dictator ( picture 5 - 6 )

Evidence
1. picture of Miku     https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/u...rbox=false

2. picture of President without Guard      https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/u...rbox=false

3. picture of President without Guard     https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/u...rbox=false

4.picture of President without Guard     https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/u...rbox=false

5. admitting to breaking her own law's simple just becourse. https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/u...rbox=false

6. admitting to breaking her own law's simple just becourse.     https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/u...rbox=false

[Awestruck]

Hi Aly,

It's clear Miku gave you fair warning that you should have replied to them. You didn't respond in radio and you were demoted.

In regard to the presidential guard, or lack thereof in your argument, it's found in your second piece of evidence that you can see an AR to the right of the President. A weapon that SWAT can equip.

Miku was protected for a majority, if not, the whole time that they were outside of Nexus. At first by Uex, then Wolven and then myself. The evidence isn't completely adequate and there are discrepancies proven by your second piece of evidence.

In conclusion, this, if somewhat valid would only result in a minor warning regardless, however it's found that the evidence is insufficient.

Denied