Fearless Forums
Large, medium, or small maps? - Printable Version

+- Fearless Forums (https://fearlessrp.net)
+-- Forum: General Discussion (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=10)
+--- Forum: Discussions (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+---- Forum: Archive (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=481)
+---- Thread: Large, medium, or small maps? (/showthread.php?tid=92760)



Large, medium, or small maps? - Rossi - 05-06-2019

I have suggested a map and a lot of people seem to say it’s too big, that’s perfectly respectable as I’m only trying to get FL to an understanding for a map. In order for other people to suggest maps and such, lets see what majority of the community wants in terms of size

The size being in terms:

Small = V2d sized maps

Medium = Around Ranox side

Large = Rockford 


What size do you prefer?  Vote!


RE: Large, medium, or small maps? - Lewwings - 05-06-2019

I’ll take a medium sized v4b1 thanks


RE: Large, medium, or small maps? - TheSiphon - 05-06-2019

One thing that should be kept in mind when talking about size is the layout.

V2D uses a linear layout, so distances are a lot longer than on maps like V4B1 or Ranox.
On V2D the size comes from long routes, while Ranox is a lot more open and compact.

[Image: QAOTjsS.png]

Red is the route from the city to industrial. 
Blue is the route from the city to the lake. 
Since Ranox has multiple routes, the distances to different parts of the map are roughly the same size. While on V2D the distance to the lake is pretty insane.


RE: Large, medium, or small maps? - Indie - 05-06-2019

Bit of a no-brainer, Medium


RE: Large, medium, or small maps? - Grizzly - 05-06-2019

Small, promotes roleplay and yet still allows for argo rpers to do there thing in a controlled amount