![]() |
Ban almos for one year - Printable Version +- Fearless Forums (https://fearlessrp.net) +-- Forum: The Courthouse (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=13) +--- Forum: Unban Request (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=15) +---- Forum: Denied (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=32) +---- Thread: Ban almos for one year (/showthread.php?tid=59179) |
Ban almos for one year - astrounaut - 03-31-2015 Your name: tgsr1997 Your ban ID: 47310 Banned by: [FL] ZedsDead Reason: Terms of Service, Double accounting Involved: Myself Why we should unban you: Hello administrators friends, I wanted to go back to your server, last year made a mistake in that I used two accounts, but one of them was my brother and this is mine. I know there are two accounts involved but the other I will not use no more , hopefully reconsider my problem and help me. Thank U RE: Ban almos for one year - astrounaut - 04-01-2015 One last chance pls guys RE: Ban almos for one year - GhostRider - 04-01-2015 It has been less than a day since this appeal was posted. Be patient. RE: Ban almos for one year - Feffe - 04-02-2015 You were in breach of Fearless Terms of Service, which is why you got banned. You are now simply saying that you will not use the other account, and since its been a year, you want to be unbanned? If you wish to have this unban request even considered for review, I advise you to put a little more effort then 2 sentences in an unban request for ToS. RE: Ban almos for one year - astrounaut - 04-02-2015 I never do this again because That's against the rules and if it something happen again you can ban me forever. Please one last chance... RE: Ban almos for one year - astrounaut - 04-02-2015 Can someone review this pls RE: Ban almos for one year - Feffe - 04-03-2015 Do not bump your own Unban request. RE: Ban almos for one year - astrounaut - 04-03-2015 Sorry didnt know. Last chance RE: Ban almos for one year - Nevy - 04-06-2015 If this was an honest mistake by your brother accessing your second account, it should have been handled immediately and not a year later. Denied. |