+- Fearless Forums (https://fearlessrp.net)
+-- Forum: The Courthouse (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=13)
+--- Forum: Staff Report (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=22)
+---- Forum: Closed (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=89)
+---- Thread: [FL] Enzyme (/showthread.php?tid=48425)
[FL] Enzyme - Badl - 06-25-2014
Name:
crewmix.at
Time/Date:
18:45 25.06.2014
Steam ID:
STEAM_0:1:11713045
Name of Administrator:
[FL] Enzyme
Evidence:
"Arguing with admin. I gave you several warnings, which you've ignored."
Situation:
I used "@" that an admin or moderator can confirm to me, that all is allowed at the clan base. - there was no answer.
30 Minutes later, i were banned for 2 hours by using Prop-gun., so i asked Enzyme, why he banned me for 2 hours, because i requested 10 times, if someone can check my base.
He told me that i have to learn the rules. The rules said that it is not allowed to pass a wall by a prop, okay, but we didnt do that. the prop is only half of the wall and it was only for the sight.
The answer of Enzyme was "You should better learn the rules, if you want that the AAA clan should exist in the future" - so my question is, what have the AAA Clan to do, with an ingame Rule-Problem???
Is it not allowed to discuss with an admin about the rules??? Because the Definition is not clear for me??? It Looks like that its not allowed, because i were banned for 1 day, for a discussion to an admin. Check the LOGS and stop beeing a childish admin which is abusing his power.
I was an Admin for 3 years, but for an action like this, what Enzyme did, i would be banned from the Admin Staff.
greetz crew
RE: [FL] Enzyme - Burnett - 06-25-2014
He clearly warned you multiple times. He also told me in @ that you kept arguing after being warned.
You should know the rules by now.
(06-25-2014, 05:11 PM)crewmix Wrote: I was an Admin for 3 years
That explains everything.
----
RE: [FL] Enzyme - Badl - 06-25-2014
He warned me, that i dont have to spawn this prop on the wall again - i said "okay".
So the warning was for what exactly? Is there a rule, that it is not allowed to discuss with an admin? - Is it a reason to be banned for 1 day?
RE: [FL] Enzyme - Burnett - 06-25-2014
(06-25-2014, 05:29 PM)crewmix Wrote: Is there a rule, that it is not allowed to discuss with an admin?
Then you don't know the rules.
General rule no. 5:
"Listen to the admin's decisions, they aren't negotiable. "
Source: http://fearlessrp.net/derma/rules.html
RE: [FL] Enzyme - Badl - 06-25-2014
Yes, i wasnt talking about the admin decision, i was talking about the rule, why he banned me 2 hours of the physix-gun!
RE: [FL] Enzyme - Burnett - 06-25-2014
(06-25-2014, 05:41 PM)crewmix Wrote: Yes, i wasnt talking about the admin decision, i was talking about the rule, why he banned me 2 hours of the physix-gun!
Rules for report:
Quote:The following points are no abuse:
Banning you, even if you don't like the reason, make an unban request for this.
Quote:BANS, BLACKLISTS OR PUNISHMENT IS NOT AN ABUSE MATTER, IF YOU WISH TO DISPUTE YOUR PUNISHMENT, DO NOT POST AN ABUSE THREAD, USE THE APPROPIATE SECTION IN THE COURTHOUSE. FAILURE TO ABIDE WILL RESULT IN UP TO 30 DAYS OF SUSPENSION.
Source: http://www.fearlessrp.net/showthread.php?tid=12393
UBR Forum: http://www.fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=15
RE: [FL] Enzyme - Enzyme - 06-25-2014
*blacklist issued and I tell you that you can't have props to look over/shoot over wall.*
Quote:v33x [18:40:45] crewmix.at (STEAM_0:1:11713045) said: /pm Enzy other admins checked this allready - and it was okay...
v33x [18:42:53] [FL] Enzyme (STEAM_0:0:31154034) said: /pm crewmix and who was the admin?
v33x [18:43:25] crewmix.at (STEAM_0:1:11713045) said: /pm enzy i wrote it with @ if someone can come to our base and check if all is right
v33x [18:43:39] [FL] Enzyme (STEAM_0:0:31154034) said: /r Were you told it was alright? Yes or no?
v33x [18:44:04] crewmix.at (STEAM_0:1:11713045) said: /pm Enzy yes, when i dont jump on the wall and use it as tresspassing its okay
v33x [18:44:16] [FL] Enzyme (STEAM_0:0:31154034) said: /r Its a walkway. End of story. Last warning
v33x [18:44:25] crewmix.at (STEAM_0:1:11713045) said: /pm Enzy its only used for 'viewing'
v33x [18:44:31] [FL] Enzyme (STEAM_0:0:31154034) said: /r Las warning.
v33x [18:44:55] crewmix.at (STEAM_0:1:11713045) said: /pm Enzym next time, tell it to me in another way! i m not a kid! THX
v33x [18:45:12] [FL] Enzyme (STEAM_0:0:31154034) said: /r Then you should have read and followed the rules.
v33x [18:45:45] crewmix.at (STEAM_0:1:11713045) said: /pm Enzy man i read this rules 100 times, every single sentences. i think i still know this rules. btw. the rules are to less
v33x [18:45:57] crewmix.at (STEAM_0:1:11713045) said: /pm Enzy there have to be more rules, not every single situation is clear
v33x [18:46:02] [FL] Enzyme (STEAM_0:0:31154034) said: /r You broke the rules. Read prop rules and base-rules.
v33x [18:47:13] crewmix.at (STEAM_0:1:11713045) said: /pm Enzy denfinition of 'walkaways'? its not as high as the wall, so its not a walkaway in my definition, this is why i requet
v33x [18:47:25] crewmix.at (STEAM_0:1:11713045) said: /pm enzy requested
v33x [18:47:38] [FL] Enzyme (STEAM_0:0:31154034) said: /r If you use a prop to look over/shoot over a wall, then its a walkway and a doomfort. Drop it.
v33x [18:47:53] [FL] Enzyme (STEAM_0:0:31154034) said: /r I will not ask you again. I will issue a ban if you continue to argue
v33x [18:48:52] crewmix.at (STEAM_0:1:11713045) said: /pm Enzy ahm, did i said that i didnt understand what you told me? - NO
v33x [18:49:06] crewmix.at (STEAM_0:1:11713045) said: /pm Enzy i m talking about the way you told me - you gave me a ban of 2 hours
v33x [18:49:25] crewmix.at (STEAM_0:1:11713045) said: /pm ENzy i wrote 10 times if the base is okay with the '@' - there was no answer!
v33x [18:49:29] [FL] Enzyme (STEAM_0:0:31154034) said: /ban crewmix 1d Arguing with admin. I gave you several warnings, which you've ignored.
Did I warn you? [YES] or [NO]
Spoiler :
Did you break General rules 5.? [YES] or [NO]?
Spoiler :
I didn't warn you one time, not twice, not three times but four times. I warned you, saying I'd issue a ban, something you didn't care about.
RE: [FL] Enzyme - Fultz - 06-28-2014
After review the evidence shown in this case, this case is closed with no abuse shown.
Closing notes:
The accused administrator warned you numerous times before a punishment was issued, but the player did no listen and was ban in result.
No abuse noted.