+- Fearless Forums (https://fearlessrp.net)
+-- Forum: Community & Server Information (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Help & Support (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+---- Forum: Support Archive (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=158)
+---- Thread: Rules Q&A 2.0 (Including updated directory) (/showthread.php?tid=37778)
RE: Rules Q&A 2.0 (Including updated directory) - Narc - 09-24-2013
(09-24-2013, 04:11 PM)GHOSTK1LL3R Wrote: For the first one, if he gets tranqed with the gun in his hands, can I kill him because when he awakes he will still be a threat?
(09-24-2013, 03:39 PM)Narcotic Wrote:(09-24-2013, 03:37 PM)GHOSTK1LL3R Wrote: 1.If a player has a gun and is shooting at you, are you allowed to tranq him and kill him? If not I don't see the point in the tranq gun, because all he will do is get back up, hunt you down, and kill you.
2.When a gunfight is going on, can you tranq a opposing player who has a weapon out, them and run up to them and tie them up? Or would this be considered FearRP?
ps. First question!
1. If you are in an active firefight and in the circumstances not affected by fear roleplay, you may tranquilize your opponent.
2. Yes.
Yes, if he persists to attack you.
RE: Rules Q&A 2.0 (Including updated directory) - Generation - 09-24-2013
Well, I have to admit that it is a good recap! Good job man.
RE: Rules Q&A 2.0 (Including updated directory) - ArcHammer - 09-24-2013
Great job! That is a very good system.
RE: Rules Q&A 2.0 (Including updated directory) - De CodeerHeer - 09-25-2013
Are invisible camera's allowed?
RE: Rules Q&A 2.0 (Including updated directory) - Narc - 09-25-2013
(09-25-2013, 11:05 AM)MavisDracula Wrote: Are invisible camera's allowed?
Read through §1.
RE: Rules Q&A 2.0 (Including updated directory) - Haarek - 09-25-2013
Sorry, but it doesn't say anything about invisible camera's in §1. However I was told at some point to not have invisible cameras. Some of the minor rules change a lot though, as I have noticed. So I am not sure anymore.
RE: Rules Q&A 2.0 (Including updated directory) - DoomDude1 - 09-25-2013
Updated.
RE: Rules Q&A 2.0 (Including updated directory) - HellShell - 09-25-2013
I've got a question about something admins have different opinions about.
If you are a BMD and you have a shop in the metro cafe, giga computers, or any other place similar to these ones and you have a sign screaming out you sell illegal goods, is it, or is it not FailRP?
I see different opinions about this and I'd like to have a final answer, I think it's FailRP, and reported people for it to which their builds got removed, a while back I stopped doing it as another admin said he thought it wasn't FailRP.
RE: Rules Q&A 2.0 (Including updated directory) - Doctor Internet - 09-26-2013
Is it allowed to post a series of binded laws as President, so long as a resonable gap is left between sets of broadcasts? (5 Laws: 5-10 min delay)
RE: Rules Q&A 2.0 (Including updated directory) - Narc - 09-26-2013
(09-26-2013, 02:52 PM)jonjon1234 Wrote: Is it allowed to post a series of binded laws as President, so long as a resonable gap is left between sets of broadcasts? (5 Laws: 5-10 min delay)
Yes.