![]() |
Why Are Moderators Still Handling PRs - Printable Version +- Fearless Forums (https://fearlessrp.net) +-- Forum: General Discussion (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=10) +--- Forum: Discussions (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +---- Forum: Archive (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=481) +---- Thread: Why Are Moderators Still Handling PRs (/showthread.php?tid=72813) |
RE: Why Are Moderators Still Handling PRs - Agorith - 07-02-2016 No salt being spread here, not from my side atleast. You started a discussion with the intent of being taken seriously, when you didn't like the answers given you started some 'banta'? Can't expect us to take you serious if this is your way of going about things. RE: Why Are Moderators Still Handling PRs - Jan - 07-02-2016 Mods are still doing player reports so that they are reviewed earlier, they learn more, your reports get reviewed earlier, seems like a win win situation to me. You are complaining because you don't think mods should do them, yet when they stop doing them and only admins do it you'll complain about it taking longer, you will complain either way. RE: Why Are Moderators Still Handling PRs - King Kickass - 07-03-2016 I like how mods do them. I don't see a problem with it. I don't mind if both Mods and Admins do them at the end of the day if they're done then they're done, it won't make a difference if a Mod or an Admin does it. This is another Anti-Jerker thread. RE: Why Are Moderators Still Handling PRs - Divey - 07-03-2016 The staff choose players who are trusted to fulfill the role of moderator and so I am more than certain that having moderators do PR is acceptable, I am sure in more severe cases they will seek an admins approval anyway. RE: Why Are Moderators Still Handling PRs - Santaliz - 07-03-2016 (07-02-2016, 12:25 PM)Infernaw Wrote: Moderators are still able to do PRs because we find it to be a great way for them to train outside of the game, and easier for admins and higher, to monitor their judgement. (07-03-2016, 08:36 AM)SelfCreeper5 Wrote: So when these mods turn into admins will they have any experience of accepting PRs? ^ RE: Why Are Moderators Still Handling PRs - Haarek - 07-03-2016 Don't have a problem with it, just saying it seems inefficient and contradicting to what the rank originally was intended for. RE: Why Are Moderators Still Handling PRs - Marty - 07-03-2016 (07-02-2016, 09:38 PM)Agorith Wrote: No salt being spread here, not from my side atleast. How do you know I didn't like the answers ? Don't assume stuff when you can't possibly make that judgement. Your being salty as I tried to have a bit of a laugh and you clearly wok up the wrong side of bed that morning. RE: Why Are Moderators Still Handling PRs - Agorith - 07-03-2016 (07-03-2016, 01:50 PM)Marty Wrote:(07-02-2016, 09:38 PM)Agorith Wrote: No salt being spread here, not from my side atleast. Not really. Like I said you obviously want to be taken serious upon having made this thread, if I had started shitposting the second I got here I'm fairly convinced you wouldn't have appreciated that and you would've called me rather immature as you have before when I made an obvious joke on Georgy's thread. Rimple effect, fam. Anyway, pointless discussion. I'm sure you've got plenty of answers of staff regarding this now, hope your questions have been answered now. RE: Why Are Moderators Still Handling PRs - Baskingner - 07-03-2016 (07-03-2016, 01:50 PM)Marty Wrote:(07-02-2016, 09:38 PM)Agorith Wrote: SNIP Oh Marty please, stop embarrasing yourself. Its painfully obvious that youre being a jackass with your "Bullshit translator". Your either extremely salty or extremely immature, probably both though. RE: Why Are Moderators Still Handling PRs - :-) - 07-03-2016 smfh i need some fries with all the salt i picked up going through these 4 pages |