![]() |
Littletown Replacement - Printable Version +- Fearless Forums (https://fearlessrp.net) +-- Forum: Community & Server Information (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: News & Announcements (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +---- Forum: Archive (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=36) +---- Thread: Littletown Replacement (/showthread.php?tid=81208) |
RE: V4B1 Replacement - User 12049 - 06-12-2017 (06-12-2017, 10:28 AM)Tomo Wrote:Nobody plays on it because V33X was where people went to make money and AFK. AS a result it acquired more consistant players of these farmers and people would play on there in morning. Due to this people would be more inclined to join V33X as there was more players as on V2D all the 'good players' would be on and as a result wouldn't want to put contra on V2D.(06-12-2017, 09:55 AM)GHOSTK1LL3R Wrote: can we PLEASE get V2D back. Everyone got GOOD FPS on that server. V2D was and still is popular, it was ideal for FPS and was small enough but yet big enough for the population of the server. I think V2D should be given another chance and I bet it would strive like it did for the 6 years before it. RE: V4B1 Replacement - Archer - 06-12-2017 We need v4b1 to be replaced, it is far too laggy and generally unsuitable for 75 players Rockford or v5p, 85 players RE: V4B1 Replacement - Tomo - 06-12-2017 (06-12-2017, 10:37 AM)GHOSTK1LL3R Wrote:(06-12-2017, 10:28 AM)Tomo Wrote:Nobody plays on it because V33X was where people went to make money and AFK. AS a result it acquired more consistant players of these farmers and people would play on there in morning. Due to this people would be more inclined to join V33X as there was more players as on V2D all the 'good players' would be on and as a result wouldn't want to put contra on V2D.(06-12-2017, 09:55 AM)GHOSTK1LL3R Wrote: can we PLEASE get V2D back. Everyone got GOOD FPS on that server. I still just can't see it based on how long it was given before being removed. But hey, reach for the stars. I certainly wouldn't object to it if it did make a return ![]() RE: V4B1 Replacement - Tomo - 06-12-2017 (06-12-2017, 10:41 AM)Sharpshooter Wrote: We need v4b1 to be replaced, it is far too laggy and generally unsuitable for 75 players Coffee - However player slots will not be changed due to stability issues. RE: V4B1 Replacement - Envy - 06-12-2017 I never gave v5p a proper chance. I'm not a fan of Rockford or Chaos City. v5p for me RE: V4B1 Replacement - Tomo - 06-12-2017 Whatever map you choose, put it on trial. Replace Littletown with it and see how it does. Don't go replacing v4b1 with a new map without any trial. My vote for a TRIAL map on the second server would go to v5p. RE: V4B1 Replacement - Broccoli - 06-12-2017 (06-12-2017, 10:41 AM)Sharpshooter Wrote: We need v4b1 to be replaced, it is far too laggy and generally unsuitable for 75 players Lol if anything the slots should be decreased for the gamemodes sake but meh, never tried v5p as a map since back when it was the 3rd server I only had a good enough computer for v2d. RIP all the v4b1 dupes though. RE: V4B1 Replacement - Marty - 06-12-2017 Can't we just keep V4B1 and change shittytown to V5P ? RE: V4B1 Replacement - Joe Joe - 06-12-2017 Seems like a change for the better how ever much I love V4B1. I'm gonna have to test all the maps before I make a verdict. RE: V4B1 Replacement - Tomo - 06-12-2017 Can I just ask an important question which seems to have been completely glazed over? What's actually wrong with V4B1? |