+- Fearless Forums (https://fearlessrp.net)
+-- Forum: CityRP - Events Server (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=489)
+--- Forum: Suggestions (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+---- Forum: Finished (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=26)
+---- Thread: [FR] 8.2a - Rule Addition (/showthread.php?tid=77891)
RE: 8.2a - Rule Addition - Hitman - 01-26-2017
You don't need to explicitly mention Chauffeurs. I am sure that if you call a taxi just to hostage him that would fall under FailRP or random hostaging or some shit like that.
Unnecessary.
-Support
RE: 8.2a - Rule Addition - I_ARE_APPLE - 01-26-2017
+Support
RE: 8.2a - Rule Addition - Woods3yy - 01-26-2017
(01-26-2017, 03:25 AM)Hitman Wrote: You don't need to explicitly mention Chauffeurs. I am sure that if you call a taxi just to hostage him that would fall under FailRP or random hostaging or some shit like that.
Unnecessary.
-Support
RE: 8.2a - Rule Addition - jhayw - 01-26-2017
+support
RE: 8.2a - Rule Addition - god - 01-26-2017
-support
Reasons already stated.
RE: 8.2a - Rule Addition - Archer - 01-26-2017
(01-25-2017, 09:42 PM)Marty Wrote: -Support
I personally don't see the need for the initial rule don't call to upstage anyway. I mean it's not like it's unheard of in real life to call for cops to lead them into a trap.
RE: 8.2a - Rule Addition - Luna - 01-26-2017
+Support
RE: 8.2a - Rule Addition - Timmy - 01-26-2017
+Support
Happend to me once
RE: 8.2a - Rule Addition - Eclipze - 01-29-2017
-Support
Reason has been stated by others
RE: 8.2a - Rule Addition - Faustin - 01-29-2017
(01-25-2017, 08:46 PM)Create Wrote: Why: Now that MrTrashTag fixed /taxi, I feel that the job Chauffeur should be added to this rule. I feel that this should be added because it can also be used for baiting. Calling for /taxi and the hostaging them. This can prevent Players finding this loophole and hostaging Chauffers.
See highlighted.
As the introduction to the rules section already states "we expect you to use your common sense and not do questionable things or search for loopholes." and rule 1.11 also states "Purposefully attempting to find loopholes in the rules will result in punishment." This addition is not necessary. -support.