![]() |
LUA vs. Python - Printable Version +- Fearless Forums (https://fearlessrp.net) +-- Forum: General Discussion (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=10) +--- Forum: Off-Topic (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +---- Forum: Archive (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=41) +---- Thread: LUA vs. Python (/showthread.php?tid=3323) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: LUA vs. Python - Transmission - 06-05-2011 (06-04-2011, 12:56 PM)*|X|*Y0U*|X|*$UCK*|X|* Wrote: Oh biowulf, biowulf, ...no offence killjoy but that's spamming. You'll also need to grasp and understand the language of LUA, and programming in general before you even attempt scripts btw. And you can't learn LUA in a week. (Well I suppose you could, if you were a fast learner and picked up on it quickly, or had experience with coding languages before, but something tell me you're neither.) RE: LUA vs. Python - Sniperwolf - 06-05-2011 Python has a lot more real-life uses. I'd still say you need to add a third option, C/C++ I love C++. RE: LUA vs. Python - KatNotDinner - 06-12-2011 Well c++ is the best, nbut I have to compile all shit. RE: LUA vs. Python - Sniperwolf - 06-12-2011 (06-12-2011, 02:08 PM)*|X|*Y0U*|X|*$UCK*|X|* Wrote: Well c++ is the best, nbut I have to compile all shit. Is that a serious point? I can't tell ... Compiling is literally as easy as clicking a button labelled 'compile' ![]() I used Dev C++ from here http://www.bloodshed.net/devcpp.html Has a built in compiler (as like all of them do). S'up to you. C++ is more useful than LUA, but python's cool too |