Yet Again [FL]Temar - Printable Version +- Fearless Forums (https://fearlessrp.net) +-- Forum: The Courthouse (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=13) +--- Forum: Staff Report (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=22) +---- Forum: Closed (https://fearlessrp.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=89) +---- Thread: Yet Again [FL]Temar (/showthread.php?tid=58392) Pages:
1
2
|
Yet Again [FL]Temar - User 12049 - 03-05-2015 Before you comment saying this is an unban request, it partially is but more so admin abuse. Name: GHOSTK1LL3R Time/Date: 4:00PM GMT-1 Steam ID: STEAM_0:0:38145384 Name of Administrator: [FL]Temar Evidence: Your wonderful Super Admin has decided to ban me for double accounting. Now, you would normally come to the assumption that if you have been banned for it, it's only an unban request? Right? Nope, not this time. Why? This is because Narcotic(While a super-admin[The Irony]) equally noticed me 'double accounting' but rather than be a bad admin, he decided to actually check if I was. Of which he did and found conclusive that I am not double accounting. Now, where does the admin abuse come in? Firstly, not checking the situation properly, 10/10 super-admin great promotion choice. Secondly, ironic how I have an admin abuse thread on him already and he decided to look into my profile and see what he can ban me for. Proof of Narc finding me 'double accounting' and proof of Narc finding me innocent[I hope admins can see this]: Me to him: http://www.fearlessrp.net/private.php?action=read&pmid=69250 http://www.fearlessrp.net/private.php?action=read&pmid=69254 http://www.fearlessrp.net/private.php?action=read&pmid=69274 http://www.fearlessrp.net/private.php?action=read&pmid=69290 http://www.fearlessrp.net/private.php?action=read&pmid=69296 Him to me: http://www.fearlessrp.net/private.php?action=read&pmid=69251 http://www.fearlessrp.net/private.php?action=read&pmid=69259 http://www.fearlessrp.net/private.php?action=read&pmid=69287 http://www.fearlessrp.net/private.php?action=read&pmid=69291 You could argue this isn't admin abuse, my equally this isn't super admin standard. I don't expect a super-admin to ban someone without actually looking into it(Noticed how the old super-admin actually did look into it like a good super-admin[Until he went Nazi] Note to everyone who isn't an admin. This is why I go around being a 'dick'. Because FL decided to promote those of whom are by no means worthy of admins and thing of themselves higher than others. RE: Yet Again [FL]Temar - General Rickets - 03-05-2015 Temar did not conduct the investigation into you double-accounting back in 2013 to avoid a ban. This is also not abuse. We cannot view the PM's. RE: Yet Again [FL]Temar - User 12049 - 03-05-2015 However he did conduct the investigation in the current and if he was to conduct the investigation in the current to find me 'double accounting' I would expect him as an S.A to delve deeper than just merely into the logs. Also you're not part of this admin abuse so I expect you to remove your comment. RE: Yet Again [FL]Temar - General Rickets - 03-05-2015 (03-05-2015, 04:19 PM)GHOSTK1LL3R Wrote: However he did conduct the investigation in the current and if he was to conduct the investigation in the current to find me 'double accounting' I would expect him as an S.A to delve deeper than just merely into the logs. Also you're not part of this admin abuse so I expect you to remove your comment. He did not conduct the investigation. I will also not remove my comment as I am 100% involved as part of the reviewing administration team. RE: Yet Again [FL]Temar - User 12049 - 03-05-2015 'a witness or in any other important relation to the admin abuse thread, this includes players who have witnessed other situations in which the admin abused.' You have zero relation to this admin abuse thread. RE: Yet Again [FL]Temar - General Rickets - 03-05-2015 (03-05-2015, 04:26 PM)GHOSTK1LL3R Wrote: 'a witness or in any other important relation to the admin abuse thread , this includes players who have witnessed other situations in which the admin abused.' As an administrator of the server we assist in the reviewing off all admin abuse threads. RE: Yet Again [FL]Temar - Temar - 03-05-2015 apart from the fact that he is an admin, you forget that its the admin team who discussed this before i issued the ban There is no abuse, all i did is review a thread make by an admin about it and issue the bans RE: Yet Again [FL]Temar - User 12049 - 03-05-2015 (03-05-2015, 04:28 PM)Temar Wrote: apart from the fact that he is an admin, you forget that its the admin team who discussed this before i issued the ban Ah so it wasn't even a just look and ban? There was a thread? Two things, who was this admin? Why I ask? Because this admin looks this up(My timeline) but yet doesn't look if t has already been seen to. Bearing in mind this is 2 years ago this incident occurred. RE: Yet Again [FL]Temar - Temar - 03-05-2015 make an unban request if you wana talk about that, this is an abuse case on me and im staying on topic RE: Yet Again [FL]Temar - General Rickets - 03-05-2015 Enlighten me on the abuse here please. |